Background: Recent government policy has looked at improving the role of ambulance services in delivering alternative care models for patients.
Objective: To review the outcomes of the introduction of some specific non-transport guidelines into an ambulance service.
Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken of the documentation produced from the use of these protocols in the first 4 months following introduction for appropriateness of use, and potential for risk of adverse outcome.
Results: Of 354 uses of the guidelines, 140 (39.5%) were considered inappropriate. A large number of these were cases where the issue was refusal of transport rather than a use of the guideline. Of the rest the more focused guidelines showed better adherence (hypoglycaemia 2/69 inappropriate, epilepsy 1/23 inappropriate) than the more non-specific guidelines (no apparent injury 17/84 inappropriate, minor limb injury 28/58 inappropriate).
Conclusions: This short study suggests that focused guidelines can help support ambulance staff decision making; however, care must be taken to ensure safe practice and that these guidelines are not used to add legitimacy to poor practice.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Competing interests: None.
- Advance Medical Priority Despatch Systems
- emergency medical technician
- Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee Guidelines
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.