Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
Do peripheral blood cultures taken in the emergency department influence clinical management?
  1. Philip T Munro,
  2. Neil Howie,
  3. Jan F Gerstenmaier
  1. Emergency Department, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr P T Munro
 Department of Emergency Medicine, Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, UK; phil.munro{at}sgh.scot.nhs.uk

Abstract

Background: Blood cultures are routinely used to investigate suspected sepsis in the emergency department despite several studies showing their limited influence on patient management.

Objectives: To quantify the use and clinical relevance of blood cultures obtained in the emergency department.

Methods: A retrospective study of blood cultures taken in the emergency department between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2004. Microbiology results and patients’ records were reviewed to determine the influence of positive cultures on subsequent patient management.

Results: 2213 blood cultures were taken in the emergency department over the study period. 132 (6%) yielded a positive result. Three positive cultures had incomplete information. Of the remaining 129 positive cultures, 30 (1.4% of all cultures) were “true positives” and 4 (0.18%) influenced subsequent patient management.

Conclusions: Blood cultures taken in our emergency department (Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK) rarely yield bacterial growth, and over 2 years only four cultures seemed to directly influence patient management. Better guidelines are required for targeted use of blood cultures in the emergency department.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • JFG completed and wrote the original pilot study; NH undertook the data collection and analysis of the main study. PTM developed the original idea and wrote the paper along with JFG and NH. PTM is the guarantor.

Linked Articles

  • Retraction notice
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Association for Accident & Emergency Medicine