Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Feasibility of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in young men attending an emergency department
  1. T Sood,
  2. D Sally,
  3. N Spencer,
  4. A Banerjee,
  5. G Hinchley
  1. Emergency Department, Chase Farm Hospital, Enfield, UK
  1. Mr A Banerjee, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chase Farm Hospital, The Ridgeway, Enfield EN2 8JL, UK; ashis.banerjee{at}


Objective: To determine the feasibility of screening asymptomatic young men for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a suburban emergency department setting.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Chase Farm Hospital Emergency Department in Enfield, North London.

Participants: Asymptomatic sexually active men aged 16–24 years.

Methods: A convenience sample of men aged 16–24 years attending the emergency department was offered urine-based screening for Chlamydia at triage. Verbal consent was obtained and first pass urine specimens were tested using the strand displacement amplification technique. Participants were traced by their preferred method of contact in order to be offered treatment within 2 weeks of attendance at the emergency department.

Results: 67 men participated, 64 of whom were tested, 3 returning positive tests. The prevalence of Chlamydia in asymptomatic men attending the emergency department was 4.7%.

Conclusion: Urine testing for genital C trachomatis in the emergency department can identify asymptomatic men in the community who may otherwise remain undetected. It is suggested that this is a worthwhile screening test to offer in the emergency department, providing follow-up for treatment can be arranged locally. There is no requirement for increased emergency department input into these patients over and above introducing them to the screening programme.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Funding: Screening was provided as part of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme and no additional funding was received.

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Ethics committee approval was obtained from the Barnet, Enfield & Haringey Local Research Ethics Committee.