Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Predicting patient arrivals to an accident and emergency department
  1. S W M Au-Yeung1,
  2. U Harder1,
  3. E J McCoy2,
  4. W J Knottenbelt1
  1. 1
    Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
  2. 2
    Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK
  1. Dr S W M Au-Yeung, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; swa02{at}


Objectives: To characterise and forecast daily patient arrivals into an accident and emergency (A&E) department based on previous arrivals data.

Methods: Arrivals between 1 April 2002 and 31 March 2007 to a busy case study A&E department were allocated to one of two arrival streams (walk-in or ambulance) by mode of arrival and then aggregated by day. Using the first 4 years of patient arrival data as a “training” set, a structural time series (ST) model was fitted to characterise each arrival stream. These models were used to forecast walk-in and ambulance arrivals for 1–7 days ahead and then compared with the observed arrivals given by the remaining 1 year of “unseen” data.

Results: Walk-in arrivals exhibited a strong 7-day (weekly) seasonality, with ambulance arrivals showing a distinct but much weaker 7-day seasonality. The model forecasts for walk-in arrivals showed reasonable predictive power (r = 0.6205). However, the ambulance arrivals were harder to characterise (r = 0.2951).

Conclusions: The two separate arrival streams exhibit different statistical characteristics and so require separate time series models. It was only possible to accurately characterise and forecast walk-in arrivals; however, these model forecasts will still assist hospital managers at the case study hospital to best use the resources available and anticipate periods of high demand since walk-in arrivals account for the majority of arrivals into the A&E department.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Ethical approval for access to pseudonymised patient records was granted by the Harrow local research ethics committee (Ref 04/Q0405/72).

Linked Articles

  • Primary survey
    Kevin Mackway-Jones