Download PDFPDF
Pharmacologically assisted laryngeal mask insertion: a consensus statement
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    PALM consensus statement: estimation of population incidence using an island model.
    • Richard J Price, Consultant
    • Other Contributors:
      • Jeffrey Proctor, Andrew Inglis

    We read with interest the PALM consensus statement (1). This is an airway rescue technique for comatose hypoxaemic patients in the pre- hospital environment. The PALM procedure could also apply to the general practitioner (GP) run community hospital environment since the facilities of a metropolitan hospital, specifically rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia (RSI), are not available.

    The islands of the west c...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    PALM: A fringe benefit for a wider group of patients

    It is a pity that the Royal College of Anaesthetists felt unable to support the recent Faculty of Prehospital Care consensus statement on pharmacologically-assisted laryngeal mask insertion (PALM) [1]. PALM was only ever intended to be used as an emergency rescue technique in patients with a lowered level of consciousness (GCS <8-9 or AVPU P or U) AND an SpO2 reading of 92%-or-less. This despite best efforts to reverse...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.