Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Satisfaction with the humanitarian response to the 2010 Pakistan floods: a call for increased accountability to beneficiaries

Footnotes

  • All authors had full access to all the data in the study, and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

  • Funding This study was funded by the Johnson and Johnson Foundation, with supplemental funds provided by the Center for Refugee and Disaster Response at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. The Johnson and Johnson Foundation had no role in the study design, the collection, analysis or interpretation of data, in the writing of the report or the decision to submit the article for publication. The researchers functioned entirely independently from the primary funder.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Because no personal medical record information was collected, the patient consent form was not necessary. The study did, however, obtain full verbal consent prior to all surveys, in accordance with IRB ethical regulations.

  • Ethics approval This study was approved for human subjects research by the IRB (case #3311) of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Participants gave informed consent before taking part.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • All authors had full access to all the data in the study, and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

  • Funding This study was funded by the Johnson and Johnson Foundation, with supplemental funds provided by the Center for Refugee and Disaster Response at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. The Johnson and Johnson Foundation had no role in the study design, the collection, analysis or interpretation of data, in the writing of the report or the decision to submit the article for publication. The researchers functioned entirely independently from the primary funder.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Because no personal medical record information was collected, the patient consent form was not necessary. The study did, however, obtain full verbal consent prior to all surveys, in accordance with IRB ethical regulations.

  • Ethics approval This study was approved for human subjects research by the IRB (case #3311) of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Participants gave informed consent before taking part.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.