Article Text

Download PDFPDF
  1. S Carrington,
  2. C Turner,
  3. J Burton,
  4. L Woolrich-Burt
  1. UHCW NHS Trust, Coventry, UK


    Objectives & Background There has been an increasing use of massive haemorrhage protocols (MHP) within our trust. A number of clinical incidents were noted around roles/responsibilities when MHPs were run. Design failures (latent errors) were felt to contribute to these. Most MHPs are untested and are reliant on clear protocols, good communication and efficient team work. We proposed that running drills of our MHP in the ED setting would allow us to identify the latent errors and human factors that exist in our MHP then addressing these.

    Methods We proposed a 2 stage process where initially we tested functionality then identified and changed aspects of the system.

    Functionality We ran 5 in-situ, real time MHP simulations involving the relevant members of the MDT in the ED. The 20 minute scenarios were followed by a structured human factors debrief. This allowed us to establish latent errors that were affecting the MHP. Results were then collated and codified from the sessions to allow planning of teaching for ED and non-ED staff.

    Redesign Following this a card redesign was identified as being necessary. We used the principles of negative space, contrast, proximity and the pictorial superiority effect. A cluster randomised recall trial was then conducted at an F2 teaching session (66 participants), with participants blinded to the other version of the cards. A trauma video was shown (thoracotomy) and recall measured after this. Data analysed by an author blinded to both the study design and the data collection. GAfREC permission given by R+D.

    Results HF/Ergonomics phase

    • 1. Difficulty identifying team members/roles

    • 2. Communication difficulties-same task being undertaken by multiple staff members

    • 3. Notes/ID labels not given to trauma team leader (TTL). TTL felt to be unapproachable

    • 4. Porters not feeling able to identify themselves

    • 5. Action cards and protocol not used-text heavy

    • 6. Staff not realising action cards were double sided

    • 7. Blood forms unavailable

    • 8. Poor prioritisation/labelling of the crossmatch sample

    • 9. Pre-arrival preparation steps being omitted

    Card redesign phase

    18 people recalled all the important information – all used the new cards. 0 people in the old card group recalled all the information. 66 of the f2s (100%) preferred new design of card.

    Conclusion HF principles helped identify areas for improvement. Utilising design principles appears to have had significant impact on the effectiveness of the cards.

    • emergency departments

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.