Responses

Download PDFPDF
BET 2: Should bite guards be used with laryngeal mask airways in adults?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Alternative to the use of an LMA bite guard

    An alternative to the use of a bite guard in conjunction with the LMA would be to employ the intubating laryngeal mask airway (iLMA), since the single-use version of the iLMA has a rigid plastic airway tube which resists occlusion by biting, as does the silicone-coated stainless steel tube with the reusable version. Additional benefits would be that the iLMA can facilitate seamless progression to blind tracheal intubation...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.