You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Letter
Lack of evidence to support use of D-dimer in pregnant women with a suspicion of pulmonary embolism
  1. Mathilde Nijkeuter
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mathilde Nijkeuter, Department of Internal Medicine, Acute Medicine UMCU, Heidelbergdreef 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands; M.Nijkeuter{at}umcutrecht.nl

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2014-204527

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Dear Editor,

    The authors1 state that current evidence supports the use of a negative D-dimer to rule out a suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE) in pregnancy. They show in table 2 five relevant studies to support their conclusion. However, the study of Damodaram2 was the only study that included patients with …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.