Article Text

Download PDFPDF

One-two-triage: validation and reliability of a novel triage system for low-resource settings
  1. Ayesha Khan1,
  2. S V Mahadevan1,
  3. Andrea Dreyfuss2,
  4. James Quinn1,
  5. Joan Woods3,
  6. Koy Somontha3,
  7. Matthew Strehlow4
  1. 1Division of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  2. 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland General Hospital, Oakland, California, USA
  3. 3University Research Co. Centre for Human Services, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  4. 4Division of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ayesha Khan, 300 Pasteur Drive, Alway Bldg., Room M121, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; akhanx{at}stanford.edu

Abstract

Objectives To validate and assess reliability of a novel triage system, one-two-triage (OTT), that can be applied by inexperienced providers in low-resource settings.

Methods This study was a two-phase prospective, comparative study conducted at three hospitals. Phase I assessed criterion validity of OTT on all patients arriving at an American university hospital by comparing agreement among three methods of triage: OTT, Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and physician-defined acuity (the gold standard). Agreement was reported in normalised and raw-weighted Cohen κ using two different scales for weighting, Expert-weighted and triage-weighted κ. Phase II tested reliability, reported in Fleiss κ, of OTT using standardised cases among three groups of providers at an urban and rural Cambodian hospital and the American university hospital.

Results Normalised for prevalence of patients in each category, OTT and ESI performed similarly well for expert-weighted κ (OTT κ=0.58, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.65; ESI κ=0.47, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.53) and triage-weighted κ (κ=0.54, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.61; ESI κ=0.57, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.64). Without normalising, agreement with gold standard was less for both systems but performance of OTT and ESI remained similar, expert-weighted (OTT κ=0.57, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.62; ESI κ=0.6, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.66) and triage-weighted (OTT κ=0.31, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.38; ESI κ=0.41, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.4). In the reliability phase, all triagers showed fair inter-rater agreement, Fleiss κ (κ=0.308).

Conclusions OTT can be reliably applied and performs as well as ESI compared with gold standard, but requires fewer resources and less experience.

  • triage
  • global health
  • emergency care systems, efficiency

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.