Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Diagnosing a painful abdominal hernia
  1. Navraj S Nagra1,2,
  2. Maxime P Cox3,
  3. Gael R Nana1,
  4. Jenny Isherwood1
  1. 1Department of General Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
  2. 2Medical Sciences Division, Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School (OUCAGS), John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
  3. 3Oxford University Medical School, Medical Sciences Teaching Centre, Oxford, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Navraj S Nagra, Medical Sciences Division, Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School (OUCAGS), Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; navraj.nagra{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Clinical introduction

An 83-year-old man with a longstanding incisional hernia presented to the ED with a 48-hour history of vomiting and constipation. His medical history included thrombotic stroke, congestive cardiac failure, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and large bowel resection.

The patient was tachypnoeic. All other observations were stable. Examination revealed a distended abdomen with a hernia protruding beneath a midline laparotomy scar. The superior portion of the hernia was reducible and the edges of the wide defect palpable. However, inferiorly there was a firm, irreducible tender knuckle of tissue. An abdominal radiograph was requested to aid diagnosis (figure 1).

Figure 1

Initial abdominal radiograph.


Which signs can be observed in the …

View Full Text


  • Contributors All authors contributed either to the management of the patient and/or authorship of this manuscript, and have all given final approval for this manuscript for submission.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.