You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Primary survey
Highlights from this issue
Free
  1. Ellen J Weber, Editor in Chief
  1. Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ellen J Weber, Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 94143-0208, California, USA; ellen.weber{at}ucsf.edu

https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207098

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Not all trauma victims come by ambulance

    This month’s Editor’s Choice, widely reported in the UK and US press, asks the question: when is a trauma victim not treated as a trauma victim? Answer: when they don’t arrive by ambulance. Analysing data on paediatric trauma between 2012 and 2015 from the UK Trauma Audit and Research Network, Davies et al discovered that only 25% of children suspected of being victims of child abuse arrive to EDs by ambulance, compared with 44% of those with accidental injury. The suspected abuse victims were largely infants, average age of 4 months, while the mean age of victims of accidental injury was 7 years. Suspected abuse victims had a higher injury severity score (ISS), yet they reached trauma centres on average 8.2 hours later than those with accidental injury. Mortality among suspected child abuse victims was more than double. In these situations, we cannot rely on the prehospital care system to start the trauma process going: when a parent brings in a traumatised baby, a high index of suspicion and then swift activation of the trauma network is needed.

    Shouldn’t all sepsis count?

    Quality measures …

    View Full Text