Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Highlights from this issue
Free
  1. Richard Body, Deputy Editor1,2
  1. 1 Manchester Royal Infirmary, Emergency Department, Manchester, UK
  2. 2 Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  1. Correspondence to Professor Richard Body; richard.body{at}manchester.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

All you need is nitrous

We are privileged to publish a wonderful randomised controlled trial this month. Seiler et al randomised children undergoing painful procedures under sedation with 70% nitrous oxide to receive additional intranasal fentanyl or a placebo. They assessed pain and sedation scale during the following 12 hours, which is quite an undertaking. Ultimately, this was a negative trial: intranasal fentanyl made no difference. So, will this trial win you over to nitrous oxide 70%? Will you abandon intranasal fentanyl? To make your decision, you’ll need to read the full paper!

Precision emergency medicine: a new approach

When preparing this month’s primary survey, I was pleasantly surprised to see Charles Reynard’s paper on the list for the March edition. I am privileged to be Charles’ supervisor and senior author, and in this issue the journal features a paper that testifies to Charles’ hard work and determination to advance the boundaries of …

View Full Text

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.