Article Text

Download PDFPDF

'But why does her foot look so bad…?’
  1. Christopher P Jukes1,
  2. Josh T Luck2,
  3. Kathryn Duke3
  1. 1 Trauma & Orthopaedics, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
  2. 2 Trauma & Orthopaedics, Ashford and St Peter's NHS Foundation Trust, Chertsey, Surrey, UK
  3. 3 Trauma & Orthopaedics, Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, Surrey, UK
  1. Correspondence to Mr Christopher P Jukes, Trauma & Orthopaedics, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK; christopher.jukes{at}nhs.net

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Clinical Introduction

A 36-year-old female driver was involved in a head-on collision, with a combined speed of 70 mph. After the primary survey, the only injury identified was a painful left ankle/foot, held in a fixed plantar-flexed and pronated position. There were no open wounds and neurovascular examination was normal. Radiographs of the left ankle were performed (figure 1).

Figure 1

Initial anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the left ankle.

Question

What is the diagnosis?

  1. Tibialis anterior tendon rupture.

  2. Lateral subtalar dislocation.

  3. Isolated simple Weber B fracture to distal fibula.

  4. Congenital deformity …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors All contributors have had input and agree on the final manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.