Article Text
Abstract
Background Decompression sickness (DCS) with spinal cord involvement has an unfortunately high rate of long-term sequelae. The objective of this study was to determine the association of prehospital variables on the outcome of spinal cord DCS, especially the influence of the initial clinical presentation and the time to recompression.
Methods This was a retrospective study using prospectively collected data which included divers with spinal cord DCS seen at a single hyperbaric centre study from 2010 to 2018. Information regarding dive, latency of onset of symptoms, time to recompression and prehospital management, that is, use of oxygen, treatment and means of evacuation, were analysed as predictor variables. The initial clinical severity was estimated by the score of the French society of diving and hyperbaric medicine (MEDSUBHYP). The primary end point was the presence or absence of sequelae at discharge assessed by the modified score of the Japanese Orthopedic Association.
Results 195 divers (48±12 years, 42 women) were included. 34% had neurological sequelae at discharge. In multivariate analysis, a MEDSUBHYP score ≥6 and a time to recompression >194 min were significantly associated with incomplete neurological recovery (OR 9.5 (95% CI 4.6 to 19.8), p<0.0001 and OR 2.1 (95% CI 1.03 to 4.5), p=0.04, respectively). Time to recompression only appeared to be significant for patients with high initial clinical severity. As time to recompression increased, the level of sequelae also increased (p=0.014).
Conclusion Determining the initial clinical severity is critical in identifying patients who need to be evacuated for recompression as quickly as possible.
- hyperbaric medicine
- critical care transport
- helicopter retrieval
- neurology
- spinal
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. All de-identified participant data are available: contact Professor Blatteau (jean-eric.blatteau@intradef.gouv.fr).
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. All de-identified participant data are available: contact Professor Blatteau (jean-eric.blatteau@intradef.gouv.fr).
Footnotes
Handling editor David Metcalfe
Contributors J-EB and SA conceived and designed the research. J-EB and SA performed the analysis. J-EB, SA, HL, JM, PL, EG, RR, AD, NV and MV analysed the data and interpreted the results, J-EB, SA and NV prepared the tables and figures. J-EB and SA edited and revised the manuscript. All approved the final version of the manuscript. J-EB is responsible for the overall content as the guarantor.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.