Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Ambulance crew’s main focus during stroke care is symptom recognition and rapid transport to specialist units to maximise access to and effectiveness of time-critical treatments. However, in England, ambulance on-scene times (OSTs) (from when the ambulance arrives at the patients’ location to when it leaves for the hospital) have increased in recent years1 and appear extended compared with international services.2 3 Increased OSTs contribute to deteriorating symptom onset to arrival at hospital times, which represents worse care for patients.4 In 2022, the Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) stroke report5 recommended an OST of less than 30 min for English ambulance services. Data on OST with suspected stroke patients across a 12-month period were collected from all English ambulance services to compare against the GIRFT recommendation and to identify any overall trend in OST.
Using a freedom of information request, the mean OST per month for all suspected stroke patients was requested from all 10 regional ambulance services in England6 for the time period December 2021 to November 2022. Cases included in the data provided were defined locally by each individual service. Monthly data are presented for each service as well as combined monthly averages and 12-month averages by service. A generalised linear model was fitted to the mean OST for suspected stroke patients in England across the 12 months reported to determine trends.
All 10 (100%) regional ambulance services supplied OST data (displayed in figure 1 and online supplemental table 1).
Supplemental material
The mean OST (minutes:seconds) across the whole dataset was 37:40 (SD 4:25), with individual service values ranging from 29:15 to 43:21 for the 12 months. The lowest monthly mean OST in any service was 27:15 (service F, May 22) and the highest was 44:20 (service D, December 21). Only 10/120 (8%) service months were below the 30 min GIRFT target. Fitting a linear model to the country-wide averages, we see a non-significant reduction in OST of 5 s per month (p=0.09, R2=0.26).
Ambulance OST for suspected stroke patients in England consistently exceeds national recommendations of <30 min5 and is longer than international comparators,2 3 despite ambulance crew stroke care being broadly similar. Ambulance OST may include time for ambulance clinicians to contact stroke specialists to discuss the patient and the appropriate destination or to pass a pre-alert, but the exact nature of these pathways varies between hospitals. Prehospital stroke care should reflect national clinical guidelines, and the variation within the data and the difference between the best and worst performing services require further examination. While the 10 services reported cover different geographies with some differences in populations, ambulance crew stroke care options are limited and stroke pathways are similar, so the difference between the best and the worst performing services is difficult to explain. While emergency recanalisation treatments for stroke are so closely linked to time, a difference of up to 14 min OST between services may be clinically important. Limitations to this data include potential differences in case ascertainment as we did not specify the definition of ‘suspected stroke cases’ but we assume this was interpreted as suspicion of stroke by the attending clinicians. The aggregate nature of the data and the inclusion of patients who received emergency and non-emergency responses and patients within and outside of recanalisation treatment windows are also limitations. Due to the time-critical nature of emergency stroke care, it remains a priority for ambulance services to reduce OST. Further work in this area could use ambulance data linked to the English National Stroke Audit to explore the impact of ambulance OST on patient care and outcomes. Individual trusts should explore ambulance crew behaviour and practice in their areas, such as McClelland et al,7 and share learning and any initiatives that effectively reduce time. Prior research7 has suggested that ambulance clinicians are completing tasks, such as IV cannulation and 12-lead ECGs, that are unlikely to affect the transport decision or patient destination but which do contribute to prolonged OST.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Supplementary materials
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Footnotes
Handling editor Aileen McCabe
X @mcclg
Presented at A poster based on this work was presented at the UK Stroke Forum in Birmingham in December 2023.
Contributors GMC devised and led the project and wrote the initial draft of the paper. HS supported data analysis. LS, TF and CP were involved in developing the project and data analysis. All authors contributed to the final draft of the paper, and all have seen the final submitted version. GMC acts as guarantor for this paper.
Funding This study was funded by a Stroke Association Postdoctoral Fellowship (Ref SA PDF 20\100001) awarded to the lead researcher (GMC).
Competing interests All authors were involved in a project led by GMC and funded by The Stroke Association to explore and reduce ambulance on-scene times in North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust during the time period described.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.