Article Text

Download PDFPDF
2566 The use and impact of rapid molecular testing for group A streptococcus in a paediatric emergency department
  1. Charlotte Durand1,
  2. Beatriz Larru2,
  3. Shrouk Messahel2,
  4. Sarah Siner2,
  5. Kelly Mayes2
  1. 1Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust
  2. 2Alder Hey Children’s Hospital

Abstract

Aims and Objectives The UK in the winter of 2022/23 experienced high rates of Group A Streptococcal disease (GAS) and viral co-circulation in the community with an increase in GAS-associated mortality. This resulted in high numbers of attendances to Emergency Departments (EDs) from concerned families putting further strain on already bursting EDs. The approval of a national interim guideline was announced to support clinical diagnosis & appropriate use of antimicrobials.

We describe the implementation of a rapid molecular test (ID NOWTM Strep A 2, Abbott) in a busy Paediatric ED.

Method and Design In patients <= 16years old presenting with symptoms/signs of possible GAS during Feb - April 2023, rapid molecular GAS testing was obtained alongside a throat culture, this was using FeverPAIN score as per NICE guideline NG 84. Patients >3yrs in whom there was diagnostic uncertainty ie FeverPAIN 2/3 had a GAS POC and throat swab, those with FeverPAIN 4/5 were treated empirically and had a throat culture sent.

Results and Conclusion During the study period we obtained 405 rapid molecular GAS tests in 400 patients (51% male). Average age was 4.5yr (SD=3.7). Out of all rapid molecular GAS tests, 266 (65.7%) were negative, 138 (34.1%) positive and 1 (0.2%) had invalid results. 362 patients (89.4%) also had a throat swab (gold standard test). Comparing the rapid molecular GAS test with throat culture results showed a sensitivity=96.8%, specificity=88.1%, Positive Predictive Value (PPV)= 74% and Negative Predictive Value (NPV)= 98.7%. Out of the 266 children with negative rapid molecular GAS test results, 164 (61.6%) did not receive antibiotic therapy.

Implementation of rapid molecular GAS testing is feasible and practical in a busy ED setting. It can be used to aid rapid decision making at the bedside, meaning appropriate, prompt treatment for GAS without need to follow up on throat culture results – beneficial both for antimicrobial stewardship and patient care.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.