Background Delayed access to specialist care for emergency patients is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality, and increased patient anxiety.
Objectives (1) To provide timelier access to inpatient and urgent outpatient specialist care for emergency patients. (2) To influence multiple stakeholders to modify their traditional practices and sustain changes.
Setting National University Hospital of Singapore, an academic medical centre with 997 beds in Singapore and over 34 sub-specialties.
Methods A set of six interventions was implemented to meet three goals: (1) provide timely access to urgent outpatient specialist care requested by the emergency department ED; (2) increase early inpatient discharges (in order to better match timing of emergency admissions); and (3) provide earlier defined care by inpatient specialists at the ED. An eight-step organisational change management plan was implemented to ensure all specialties complied with the changes.
Results The goals were achieved. (1) Specialist outpatient appointments given within the timeframe requested by the ED doctor increased from 51.7% to 80.8%. (2) Early discharges increased from 11.9% to 26.6% and were sustained at 27.2%. (3) 84% of eligible patients received earlier defined specialist care at the ED. The change management achieved excellent clinician compliance rates ranging from 84% to 100%. However the median wait for admission remained unchanged.
Conclusion The interventions reduced the time for ED patients to access specialist outpatient and inpatient care. The systematic organisational change management approach resulted in sustained compliance.
- Quality improvement
- access to care
- organisational change management
- emergency delays
- timely discharges
- emergency department
- quality assurance
- emergency care systems
- admission avoidance
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement The original dataset and additional data analysis are available from the corresponding author at . Consent was not obtained but the presented data are anonymised and risk of identification is low. The majority of the data was not clinical data, but rather administrative system data.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.