You are here

  • Home
  • Online First
  • Authors’ response to ’Impact of physician navigators: looking beyond productivity metrics and silver bullets' by Leung et al

Article Text

Article menu

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Letter
Authors’ response to ’Impact of physician navigators: looking beyond productivity metrics and silver bullets' by Leung et al
  1. Shawn E Mondoux,
  2. Mathew Mercuri
  1. Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mathew Mercuri, Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada; mercurmd{at}mcmaster.ca

https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2018-207455

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    We would like to thank Dr Leung et al1 and the editors for the opportunity to engage in further discussion on the issues presented in our commentary entitled ‘Tackling the demand for emergency department services: there are no silver bullets’.2 We believe that the intervention proposed by Leung et al3 demonstrated improved timeliness to definitive patient care and was an important contribution to the medical literature around emergency department (ED) flow optimisation. Furthermore, we applaud the authors on a broader adoption of the programme to their local clinical environment and their ability to change culture in the clinical …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors Both authors drafted the letter and approved the final submission.

    • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient consent Not required.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles