You are here

  • Home
  • Online First
  • Paediatric emergency medicine in the UK: are we meeting the needs of our children today? A descriptive workforce survey 2006–2023

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Letter
Paediatric emergency medicine in the UK: are we meeting the needs of our children today? A descriptive workforce survey 2006–2023
  1. Anne Frampton1,
  2. Rachel Jenner2
  1. 1Children's Emergency Department, UHBW, Bristol, UK
  2. 2Paediatric Emergency Department, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Anne Frampton; anne.frampton{at}UHBristol.nhs.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214158

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    In England, the rate of emergency department (ED) attendance in the first year of life is greater than at any other age, amounting to 122 visits per 100 000 population.1 Children aged 0–16 accounted for 23% of ED attendances (more than 5.4 million children) in 2022/2023, with children aged 0–4 accounting for 11%. Paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) was first recognised in the UK in 2001 with all doctors required to have a parent specialty—emergency medicine (EM) or paediatrics.

    A 2013 census2 by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine found variation across the UK in PEM provision and that the intercollegiate gold3 standard of at least one PEM consultant in any department seeing>16 000 children was not being met. This standard was updated in 20184 to recommend that all EDs treating children should have a PEM consultant. Audit data published in 2022 demonstrated that 41% of departments did not meet this standard.5

    Growth of the subspecialty is …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Handling editor Shammi L Ramlakhan

    • X @rmjenner

    • AF and RJ contributed equally.

    • Contributors AF conceived the idea and submitted the freedom of information request to the General Medical Council. Both AF and RJ contributed equally to the review of the data and write up and are responsible for the overall content.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.