Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Background Pulse oximetry measures oxygen saturation non-invasively by using differential absorption of infrared signals which are dependent on the oxyhaemoglobin:deoxyhaemoglobin ratio. We tested the hypothesis that pulse oximetry error in measurements of blood oxygen saturations may be associated with blood haemoglobin levels.
Methods The study design was an observational study of all adult patients admitted to a large teaching hospital with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection from February 2020 to December 2021 who had arterial blood gases (ABG) drawn. The pulse oximetry reading was compared with the arterial saturation on the ABG and the measurement error was determined according to the ABG haemoglobin. A secondary analysis was performed among a subset of patients with venous haemoglobins drawn within 24 hours, comparing measurement error between ABG arterial saturation and pulse oximetry readings between those with normal (150 g/L) and low (70 g/L) haemoglobins.
Results The analysis used 5922 paired oxygen saturations from 3994 patients with contemporaneous haemoglobin measurements by ABG. A 1 g/L decrease in blood haemoglobin was associated with an 0.021% (95% CI: +0.008% to +0.033%) increase in the measurement error (in the direction of a falsely elevated reading.). In the 1086 patients who had had a venous haemoglobin there was a 0.055% (95% CI: +0.020% to +0.090%) increase in the measurement error of oxygen saturation per 1 g/L decrease in blood haemoglobin. The measurement error was thus greater in those with anaemia than in those with normal haemoglobin.
Conclusion As blood haemoglobin decreases, the oxygen saturation measurement derived from a pulse oximeter reads erroneously higher than the true value measured by ABG. While this study was confined to patients with COVID-19, physicians should be aware of this potential discrepancy among all patients with haemorrhage or known anaemia
- acute medicine
- emergency department
- epidemiology
- respiratory
Data availability statement
No data are available.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
No data are available.
Footnotes
Handling editor Ellen J Weber
Contributors The database was established by JW, TC, CC, MS, SB, JM, IJ, SC and SH-P. The hypothesis was generated by AF and DS. The statistical analysis was by CC. AF drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to editing and approved the final version of the manuscript. AF is guarantor.
Funding University of Nottingham (salaries, no grant) and Nottingham University Hospitals Trust (salaries, no grant).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.