Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Is it time to reframe resuscitation in trauma?
  1. Rich Carden1,
  2. Daniel Horner2,3
  1. 1Department of Adult Critical Care, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  2. 2Critical Care Department, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
  3. 3Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rich Carden; r.carden{at}doctors.org.uk

Abstract

Trauma remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity. Non-compressible torso haemorrhage is one of the key drives of these mortality data. Our contemporary management has focused on damage control resuscitation, with a focus on haemorrhage control, haemostatic resuscitation and permissive hypotension. The evidence for permissive hypotension lacks the robustness as other treatments, such as tranexamic acid. Despite this clinicians still target arbitrary systolic blood pressure cutoffs as both goals and ceilings of therapy. In this paper, we suggest that perhaps more consideration should be given to the diastolic blood pressure in bleeding trauma patients. The diastolic blood pressure is critical for coronary perfusion, and in turn the cardiac output responsible for cerebral blood flow. We suggest that a move to reframing resuscitation in terms of physiology may change the way that we resuscitate these patients and allow for more nuanced treatment strategies.

  • trauma
  • major trauma management

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Handling editor Jason E Smith

  • X @richcarden, @rcemprof

  • Contributors RC developed the idea for the manuscript. Both RC and DH have contributed equally to the development of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.