TY - JOUR T1 - An evaluation of the referral process in the emergency department JF - Emergency Medicine Journal JO - Emerg Med J SP - 827 LP - 832 DO - 10.1136/emermed-2013-202532 VL - 31 IS - 10 AU - Susan J Croft AU - Jane Barnes AU - Clare Ginnis AU - Robin Chatters AU - Suzanne Mason Y1 - 2014/10/01 UR - http://emj.bmj.com/content/31/10/827.abstract N2 - Introduction Making an effective telephone referral is an important skill for an emergency department (ED) clinician. It is essential for patient safety that the information is conveyed in a succinct manner to the correct inpatient specialty. The aim of this study was to assess: the impact of grade of staff making the referral; specialty referred to; and condition or patient problem. It also aimed to identify current problems or barriers in the referral process. Methods This prospective study took place in one large teaching hospital in the UK. There were two parts: data collection to obtain information on each referral made by ED staff; and questionnaires administered to obtain opinions on the current referral process from both staff making and receiving the referrals. Results Data were collected over 6 days and included 362 referrals. The mean evaluation of the referral process (scored 0–4) for all referrals was 3.34 (SD 0.95). 22 ED staff responding (64.7%) felt that some specialties were more difficult to refer to than others. 60.6% of non-ED staff accepting referrals felt they would like some form of senior ED screening process prior to referral compared with 20.6% of ED staff. The most common topics commented on were communication, education and process. Discussion There are differences in understanding and opinion between ED and non-ED staff about the referral process. There are also factors which influence ease of referral: specialty referring to and patient problem. More intervention studies are required to identify solutions that can be implemented and sustained in routine practice. ER -