RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Paediatric ED reattendance rates: comparing nurse practitioners and other clinicians
JF Emergency Medicine Journal
JO Emerg Med J
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the British Association for Accident & Emergency Medicine
SP 379
OP 382
DO 10.1136/emermed-2013-203514
VO 32
IS 5
A1 Jane E Feetham
A1 Will Christian
A1 Jonathan R Benger
A1 Rebecca Hoskins
A1 David Odd
A1 Mark D Lyttle
YR 2015
UL http://emj.bmj.com/content/32/5/379.abstract
AB Objective The aim of this project is to establish the unplanned reattendance rate for paediatric emergency nurse practitioners (PENPs) working in a designated paediatric emergency department (PED) while identifying the case mix of patients seen by PENPs compared with their medical counterparts. Design Quantitative data regarding patient characteristics and reattendance were collected during retrospective review of case notes across two representative 2-week periods. Setting The study site is a tertiary urban PED with an annual attendance of 32 000 patients aged from birth to 15 years. Main outcome measures Reattendance rates, patient characteristics, triage scores, presenting complaint and numbers of patients discussed with a paediatric emergency medicine consultant were evaluated. Results The results showed that PENPs have a lower reattendance rate (1.75%) when compared with senior and junior doctors in training (4.29%, 5.76%); however, PENPs treat a different population of children. When the odds of PENP reattendance are adjusted for this, the significance of the difference becomes less certain. Conclusions PENPs work autonomously when seeing children presenting with minor trauma and make a positive contribution in achieving the reattendance Clinical Quality Indicator.