@article {Greenslade517, author = {Jaimi H Greenslade and Robert Nayer and William Parsonage and Shaela Doig and Joanna Young and John W Pickering and Martin Than and Christopher Hammett and Louise Cullen}, title = {Validating the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) and Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) rules for the prediction of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain}, volume = {34}, number = {8}, pages = {517--523}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1136/emermed-2016-206366}, publisher = {British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine}, abstract = {Background The Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) rule and the Troponin-only MACS (T-MACS) rule risk stratify patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This observational study sought to validate and compare the MACS and T-MACS rules for assessment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods Prospectively collected data from twoEDs in Australia and New Zealand were analysed. Patients were assigned a probability of ACS based on the MACS and T-MACS rules, incorporating high-sensitivity troponin T, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein, ECG results and clinical symptoms. Patients were then deemed very low risk, low risk, intermediate or high risk if their MACS probability was less than 2\%, between 2\% and 5\%, between 5\% and 95\% and greater than 95\%, respectively. The primary endpoint was 30-day diagnosis of AMI. The secondary endpoint was 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) including AMI, revascularisation or coronary stenosis (\>70\%). Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated to assess the accuracy of the MACS and T-MACS rules.Results Of the 1244 patients, 114 (9.2\%) were diagnosed with AMI and 163 (13.1\%) with MACE. The MACS and T-MACS rules categorised 133 (10.7\%) and 246 (19.8\%) patients, respectively, as very low risk and potentially suitable for early discharge from the ED. There was one false negative case for both rules making sensitivity 99.1\% (95.2\%{\textendash}100\%).Conclusions MACS and T-MACS accurately risk stratify very low risk patients. The T-MACS rule would allow for more patients to be discharged early. The potential for missed MACE events means that further outpatient testing for coronary artery disease may be required for patients identified as very low risk.}, issn = {1472-0205}, URL = {https://emj.bmj.com/content/34/8/517}, eprint = {https://emj.bmj.com/content/34/8/517.full.pdf}, journal = {Emergency Medicine Journal} }