@article {Slessemermed-2020-209992, author = {Ryan Taylor Sless and Nathaniel Edward Hayward and Paul MacDaragh Ryan and Conor Deasy and Kantikiran Dasari}, title = {Emergency department attendances during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective analysis of attendances following Irish governmental pandemic measures}, elocation-id = {emermed-2020-209992}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1136/emermed-2020-209992}, publisher = {British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine}, abstract = {Background COVID-19 has resulted in the death of over 1 million people to date. Following government-implemented regulations, there has been concern over the apparent decline in emergency department (ED) attendances and the resultant health legacy. Therefore, we aimed to characterise the attendances to an Irish tertiary hospital ED following the implementation of these regulations during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods This retrospective observational study investigated all attendances to the Cork University Hospital ED from 15 February to 11 April in 2020 and 2017{\textendash}2019. Attendances were stratified into four periods: Before COVID (BC) (15 February to 5 March), After COVID (AC) (6 March to 12 March), Educational Closure (EC) (13 March to 27 March) and Stay Home (SH) (28 March to 11 April), as per government regulations. Triage presentations of abdominal pain, shortness of breath, chest pain, headache and trauma were examined. Data were analysed by independent t-tests and χ2 analysis.Results There were 8261 attendances to the ED in the 2020 time period compared with a mean of 10 389 attendances during the corresponding periods in 2017{\textendash}2019. There was a significant decrease in daily attendances in 2020 compared with 2017{\textendash}2019 in the AC (142 vs 188, p=0.02), EC (122 vs 184, p\<0.001) and SH (121 vs 181, p\<0.001) periods, including significant decreases in abdominal pain (AC: 9 vs 22, EC: 10 vs 19, SH: 11 vs 18, p\<0.001), chest pain (AC: 9 vs 15, EC: 8 vs 15, SH: 9 vs 15, p\<0.01), headache (AC: 5 vs 11, EC: 4 vs 9, SH: 4 vs 9, p\<0.01) and trauma (AC: 3 vs 5, EC: 2 vs 6, SH: 3 vs 5, p\<0.01).Conclusion Our findings suggest that the combination of government-imposed restrictions and perceived risk of attending an ED during a pandemic may contribute to reduced attendances. Public confidence in EDs is necessary to reduce collateral damage caused by failure to seek medical attention during a pandemic; adequate infrastructure to allow social distancing and isolation capacity in EDs is a necessity.Data are available upon reasonable request. Contact from Corresponding Author.}, issn = {1472-0205}, URL = {https://emj.bmj.com/content/early/2021/04/12/emermed-2020-209992}, eprint = {https://emj.bmj.com/content/early/2021/04/12/emermed-2020-209992.full.pdf}, journal = {Emergency Medicine Journal} }