TY - JOUR T1 - Lessons learnt in ethical publishing from mass casualty events: the Manchester bombing experience JF - Emergency Medicine Journal JO - Emerg Med J SP - 744 LP - 745 DO - 10.1136/emermed-2021-211661 VL - 38 IS - 10 AU - Edward Carlton AU - Ellen J Weber Y1 - 2021/10/01 UR - http://emj.bmj.com/content/38/10/744.abstract N2 - There are certain events that resonate with all emergency clinicians, events that many of us hope we will never bear witness to and events that, unfortunately, some of us have. Mass casualty events are thankfully rare, with estimates in the USA of around 0.15% of all emergency service calls.1 However, in 2017 the NHS in the UK was faced with an unprecedented number of such events, including the Manchester Arena bombing. Each event poses new challenges in terms of environment, threats posed to staff and casualties and the injuries sustained.2 It is therefore important for ‘lessons learnt’ from mass casualty events to continue to be written up and published in a robust and scientific manner.3 However, at the centre of every mass casualty event are the patients themselves, those who may not survive, those who survive with life-changing injuries and those who are lucky to escape without physical injury but who suffer long-term psychological trauma as a result of events they witness. Authors of reports around mass casualty events therefore have a unique challenge when presenting events in a way that is scientific yet considers ethical publishing in terms of patient consent, potentially identifiable data, considerations of impact of publishing on communities and inevitable media reporting. Editors and journals too have a similar responsibility to patients who are involved in such events. It is therefore a great opportunity for the Emergency Medicine Journal (EMJ) not only to publish Dark et … ER -