TY - JOUR T1 - Comparing complaint-based triage scales and early warning scores for emergency department triage JF - Emergency Medicine Journal JO - Emerg Med J DO - 10.1136/emermed-2021-211544 SP - emermed-2021-211544 AU - Michiel Schinkel AU - Lyfke Bergsma AU - Lars Ingmar Veldhuis AU - Milan L Ridderikhof AU - Frits Holleman Y1 - 2022/04/13 UR - http://emj.bmj.com/content/early/2022/04/12/emermed-2021-211544.abstract N2 - Background Emergency triage systems are used globally to prioritise care based on patients’ needs. These systems are commonly based on patient complaints, while the need for timely interventions on regular hospital wards is usually assessed with early warning scores (EWS). We aim to directly compare the ability of currently used triage scales and EWS scores to recognise patients in need of urgent care in the ED.Methods We performed a retrospective, single-centre study on all patients who presented to the ED of a Dutch Level 1 trauma centre, between 1 September 2018 and 24 June 2020 and for whom a Netherlands Triage System (NTS) score as well as a Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) was recorded. The performance of these scores was assessed using surrogate markers for true urgency and presented using bar charts, cross tables and a paired area under the curve (AUC).Results We identified 12 317 unique patient visits where NTS and MEWS scores were documented during triage. A paired comparison of the AUC of these scores showed that the MEWS score had a significantly better AUC than the NTS for predicting the need for hospital admission (0.65 vs 0.60; p<0.001) or 30-day all-cause mortality (0.70 vs 0.60; p<0.001). Furthermore, when non-urgent MEWS scores co-occur with urgent NTS scores, the MEWS score seems to more accurately capture the urgency level that is warranted.Conclusions The results of this study suggest that EWSs could potentially be used to replace the current emergency triage systems.Data are available on reasonable request. ER -