Table 4 Systematic reviews
StudyClinical questionInclusion/exclusion criteriaLiterature search methodsAppraisal of literatureConclusions drawnLimitations
Bleakley et al, 2004, Ireland2To explore the clinical evidence base for cryotherapy. Five sub-questions posed.Human studies up to 2002. Broad inclusion criteria – trauma and postoperative RCTs. 4 outcome measures: pain, swelling, ROM and functionMultiple databases, hand searches and citation tracking. 22 studies found (5 relating to soft tissue injury, 17 relating to surgery).Used PEDro scoring, range 2–5/10. Appraisal inconclusiveMany more high quality studies are needed to ensure adequate evidence-based practiceClinical question was not focused, hence reducing study validity and applicability. Mixed population –trauma and surgery. Non-specific conclusion due to breadth of clinical question
Hubbard et al, 2004, USA3Does cryotherapy hasten return to participation?Clear and relevant. Focused clinical questionEnglish language journals 1976–2003. Limits included RCTs only. 4 trials foundUsed PEDro scoring, range 2–4/10. Good appraisalCryotherapy instituted soon after injury may be effective in speeding return to work or sportsWell designed systematic review with focused clinical question. Major limitation is paucity of papers obtained