Table 4

Univariable analyses of predictor variables of practice admission rate (n=145) 2007/8

VariableIRR (95% CI)% Changep Value
Total clinical points0.998 (0.99 to 0.999)−0.2%0.02
Total organisational points0.998 (0.99 to 0.999)−0.2%0.04
% Satisfied with phone access0.995 (0.99 to 0.998)−0.5%0.003
% Able to book 2 days ahead0.996 (0.99 to 0.999)−0.4%0.0008
% Able to get appointment in 48 h0.99 (0.98 to 0.997)−1.0%0.0007
% Able to book with a specific GP0.99 (0.98 to 0.996)−1.0%0.0001
% Satisfied with opening hours0.99 (0.98 to 1.01)−1.0%0.21
Distance from hospital (miles)0.98 (0.97 to 0.99)−2.0%<0.0001
% of Practice male0.99 (0.97 to 1.02)−1.0%0.46
Age (% of practice patients 65+ years)1.01 (0.99 to 1.02)1.0%0.1
Practice deprivation score1.01 (1.009 to 1.02)1.0%<0.0001
% of Practice white ethnicity0.998 (0.995 to 0.999)−0.2%0.02
Size of practice (no of patients)0.99998 (0.99997 to 0.99999)−0.002%0.0003
Coronary heart disease prevalence1.09 (1.03 to 1.16)9.0%0.002
% Response rate to access survey0.99 (0.98 to 0.998)−1.0%0.006
  • N=145 for all variables.

  • Figures in the second column are incident rate ratios (IRR). Subtracting 1 from the IRR and then multiplying by 100 gives the percentage change in the expected admissions count for a 1 unit increase in the predictor. So for practice deprivation score, for every extra deprivation point, the expected admissions count increases by 1%. IRR less than 1.0 represent decreases and IRR greater than 1.0 represent increases in the count. Statistical model: negative binomial regression, using log of the list size as the offset.

  • GP, general practitioner.