Table 1

Characteristics of eligible trials

StudySettingParticipantsExclusionsMethodOutcomes measuredOutcome (US vs ST)Operator experienceRandomisation methodJadad score
25ICU in FranceAdult patients with DA defined as absence of visible/palpable veins in arms after tourniquet placementNot statedRT, SO performed by nurse in transverse plane versus ST. Crossover to alternative group after two failed attemptsSuccessful PIV cannulation before and after crossover, procedure time
  • 21/30 (70%) vs 11/30 (37%)

  • Time in mins: 6.6 vs 7.25

Nurse—number participating in study not reported, level of training with Ultrasound not reportedNot reported1
21ED tertiary care, teaching hospital in USA.Patients with two failed blind PIV attempts or reported history of DANot statedSO performed by ENs vs STNumber of attempts, procedure time, patient satisfaction, patient pain perception
  • No. of punctures: 1.9 vs 2.3

  • Time in minutes: 23.7 vs 8.1.

  • Patient satisfaction: 93.3% vs 77.8%

Number not reported. EN received 2 h tutorial from diagnostic medical sonography-certified EPNot reported1
26ED at urban tertiary care teaching hospital in USA.
  • Patients >18 years with >DA in arm veins (brachial, forearm, cephalic, and basilic) and EJV

  • DA≥2 peripheral attempts Ultrasound guidance versus ST

Unstable patients/patients requiring emergency intravenous lineEPs instructed to use their most effective method including SO/DO, transverse/longitudinal versus STNumber of attempts, procedure time, patient satisfaction
  • 2.07 vs 2.37 (mean no)

  • 2 vs 2 (median)

  • Time in minutes: 26 vs 29

  • Patient satisfaction Likert scale: 8 vs 7

Twenty EC, 12 credentialed in Ultrasound. Remainder received introductory course 1-year prior plus 1 h training program on model. All received 6-month period to practice technique before trialComputer-generated randomisation.3
3Level 1 Paediatric trauma centre in USA
  • Patients <10 years with DA

  • DA=2 peripheral attempts or history of difficult access

Critical illness, no guardians to provide consent, primary language other than English or SpanishRT, DO (physician used Ultrasound, nurse placed line). Transverse axis inserted at 30° angle versus ST ± fiberoptic transillumination by nurseOverall success rates, number of attempts, procedure times
  • 20/25 (80%) vs 16/25 (64%)

  • No. of attempts: 1 vs 3 (median)

  • Total time in min 6.3 vs 14.1

Five Paediatric EC and fellows with limited experience received 90 min tutorial. Twenty-nine paediatric EN, 16 who performed Ultrasound-guided attempts with 15 min tutorial and practice on live patientsBlock randomisation according to computer-generated programme2
24ED at urban level 1 trauma centre in USA.
  • Patients <7 years with 1 failed intravenous attempt

  • Ultrasound guidance

Unstable patients
  • Indirect method, DO vs ST

  • Vein localised by physician with Ultrasound, marked and intravenous placed by nurse. Crossover for ST group to Ultrasound after 1 failed attempt

  • Venopuncture and PIV cannulation success rate at 1st attempt

  • Perceived ease of puncture by nurses

  • IVC: 8/23 (35%) vs 6/21 (29%)

  • EOP: 4/18 (22%) vs 0

Six board certified EP with 1 h tutorial and experience visualising veins in 1 adult and 1 child. Paediatric EN given overview of technique.Computer generated randomisation2
232007, USA
  • Patients >18 years

  • Past history of DA or DA determined by anaesthetist

Not statedRT SO performed by nurse anaesthetist versus STSuccessful rate on 1st attempt, number of attempts, procedure time
  • 74% vs 81% in Ultrasound vs ST

  • 1.4 vs 1.3.

  • Time in mins: 5.06 vs 2.87

Two certified registered nurse anaesthetists with >3 years' experience 1
222006, USA
  • Patients >18 years

  • Two unsuccessful attempts by ST

Steroid or anticoagulant therapyRT, SO performed by anaesthetist versus ST at antecubital fossaNo. of attempts, procedure time, patient pain perception
  • 1.7 vs 3.2 in

  • Time in mins: 13.9 vs 11.3

Trained anaesthetists with >5 previous successful Ultrasound intravenous attemptsRandom number3
  • DA, difficult access; DO, dual operator; EC, emergency consultant.; ED, emergency department; EN, emergency nurse; EOP, ease of puncture; EP, emergency physician; PIV, peripheral intravenous; RT, real time; SO, single operator; ST, standard technique; Ultrasound, ultrasound.