Table 2

Relationship between ELISA levels and resource consumption

ResourcesELISA1 (n=34)ELISA2 (n=68)ELISA3 (n=223)ELISA4 (n=199)ELISA5 (n=20)p Value
Monitoring32 (94.1%)41 (60.3%)34 (15.2%)3 (1.5%)0<0.01
Specialised consultation5 (14.7%)7 (10.3%)29 (13%)26 (13%)1 (5%)1
Blood analysis34 (100%)60 (88%)195 (87.4%)41 (20.6%)4 (20%)<0.01
Blood gas analysis13 (38.2%)6 (8.8%)12 (5.4%)00<0.01
Urine3 (8.8%)5 (7.3%)53 (23.8%)6 (3%)1 (5%)<0.01
Serology1 (2.9%)3 (4.4%)5 (2.2%)7 (3.5%)00.69
Bacteriology5 (14.7%)8 (11.7%)53 (23.8%)5 (2.5%)2 (10%)<0.01
Basic x-rays17 (50%)40 (58.8%)124 (55.6%)118 (59.3%)7 (35%)0.27
Abdominal ultrasound09 (13.2%)79 (35.4%)15 (7.5%)2 (10%)<0.01
CT imaging9 (26.4%)15 (22.1%)69 (30.9%)7 (3.5%)2 (10%)<0.01
ECG30 (88.2%)45 (66.2%)62 (27.8%)8 (4%)2 (10%)<0.01
EEG1 (2.9%)1 (14.7%)12 (5.4%)00<0.01
Endoscopy2 (5.8%)1 (14.7%)12 (5.4%)000.02
Echocardiography6 (17.6%)4 (5.9%)6 (2.7%)00<0.01
Holter ECG001 (0.4%)00
Stress test04 (5.9%)1 (0.4%)00<0.01
Coronary angiography8 (23.5%)3 (4.4%)000<0.01
  • ELISA, Echelle Liégeoise d'Index de Sévérité à l'Admission.