TableĀ 4

Methods used to assess patient's coagulation status

Method of assessmentNumber of responses (%) n=98Neurosurgical unit number (%) n=25Non-neurosurgical unit number (%) n=73
INR/near patient INR57 (58%)10 (40%)47 (64%)
Coagulation screen46 (47%)12 (48%)34 (47%)
Liver function tests4 (4%)2 (8%)2 (3%)
ROTEM or TEG4 (4%)2 (8%)2 (3%)
Full blood count8 (8%)2 (8%)6 (8%)
Clinical findings2 (2%)2 (8%)0 (0%)
Platelets7 (7%)1 (4%)6 (8%)
Fibrinogen/fibrin degradation product10 (10%)7 (28%)2 (3%)
Activated partial thromboplastin time11 (11%)1 (4%)10 (14%)
Partial Prothrombin time2 (2%)0 (0%)2 (3%)
Prothrombin Time6 (6%)2 (8%)4 (5%)
Other4 (4%)1 (4%)3 (4%)
No further assessment required8 (8%)4 (16%)4 (5%)
  • Other: haemoglobin, liaise with the on-call haematologist, intracellular calcium and arterial/venous blood gases.

  • Free text box used so any number of responses permitted. Total respondents=98.

  • INR, International normalised ratio; ROTEM, rotational thromboelastometry; TEG, thromboelastography.