Characteristics of the 22 included studies and contributions to meta-synthesis
(a) Characteristics of individual studies | (b) Principal contribution(s) of individual studies to each analytical theme (‘need’) | |||||||||
First author (year) country | Setting | Summary of aims | Approach Methods Sampling | Patient population | Key findings | C=Communication; E=Emotional; CA=Care W=Waiting P=Physical/ Environ. | ||||
C | E | CA | W | P | ||||||
Burström (2013)30 Sweden | 3 EDs | To explore waiting in the ED | Grounded Theory Staff interviews and patient observation Theoretical sampling | Observation of patients in the waiting room | Indicators of ‘non-acceptable’ waiting included physical densification, contact seeking and emergence of critical situations. Staff were ashamed and frustrated with non-acceptable waiting. Waiting management may be achieved by changing the patient experience | • | • | • | • | |
Caldicott (2005)21 USA | 1 ED | To compare the experiences of ED patients in the context of those ‘turfed’ to other specialities vs deemed appropriate | Descriptive approach Semi-structured interviews Convenience sampling | 26 adult patients | 10 themes divided between two main categories, which were (i) interpersonal issues’ and (ii) technical/systems issues. Themes classified as either ‘favourable’ or ‘unfavourable’ Global experience was negative for ‘turfed’ patients | • | • | • | • | |
Clarke (2007)32 Canada | 1 ED | To determine satisfaction with mental healthcare in ED | Descriptive approach Focus groups Convenience sampling | 27 adult mental health service users | Themes included: ‘waiting in the ED’, ‘attitudes of treatment staff’, ‘diagnostic overshadowing’, ‘nowhere else to go’, and ‘family needs’ Devised a list for ideal services | • | • | |||
Cypress (2014)24 USA | 1 ED | Experiences of patients triaged as ‘critically ill’ | Phenomenology Interviews Purposive sampling | 23 participants including 10 patients | Patients and relatives valued ‘critical thinking’, ‘communication’ and ‘sensitivity and caring’ behaviours in nurses. Desirable aspects of communication included listening, identifying, greeting and interacting with patients. ‘Sensitivity and caring’ included advocating for critically unwell patients and empathy | • | • | • | ||
Hillman (2014)44 UK | 1 ED | To examine the concept of legitimacy and processes of negotiation between patients and staff in the ED | Ethnography Observation with follow-up interviews Thematic analysis Convenience sampling | 50y older adult patients | Patients were compelled to legitimise their reasons for attendance and justify these in order to be perceived positively by staff, which shaped their access to resources and determined their ED experience | • | • | |||
Kihlgren (2004)25 Sweden | 1 ED | To explore the experience of waiting in the ED | Grounded theory Observation Convenience sampling | 20 patients aged >25 years | 6 core variables emerged, which were (i) unpleasant waiting, (ii) unnecessary waiting, (iii) lack of good routines during the waiting stage, (iv) suffering during the waiting stage, (v) bad feelings during the waiting stage and (vi) nursing care during the waiting stage | • | • | • | • | |
Lin (2008)26 Taiwan | 1 ED | To investigate the patient experience of empathy | Descriptive In-depth interviews Convenience sampling | 28 participants including 7 patients | 4 themes emerged. These were (i) when patients expressed their feelings, physicians did not resonate with concerns, (ii) patient required psychological comfort, (iii) patients needed feedback from physicians but did not always get this and (iv) physicians found the physical environment difficult to overcome | • | • | |||
MacWilliams (2016)20 Canada | 3 EDs 1 Tertiary 2 Local | To explore the experiences of women attending the ED to get care for a miscarriage | Interpretive Phenomenology Semi-structured interviews Convenience sampling | 8 female patients (suspected miscarriage) | 5 themes resulted, which were: (i) pregnant=life vs miscarriage=death, (ii) deciding to go to the ED, (iii) not an illness—a different type of trauma, (iv) need for acknowledgement and (v) leaving the ED: What now?. Patients felt that staff were dismissive of their loss | • | • | |||
Nyden (2003)31 Sweden | 1 ED | To examine older peoples’ basic needs in ED | Interpretive approach Interviews Convenience sampling | 7 participants between 65 and 88 years | Needs of older adults attending the ED were interpreted according to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Basic needs at the lower tiers of the hierarchy were well represented. Higher needs tended to be neglected, including the need to know and understand. Patients needed to feel safe | • | • | • | ||
Nystrom (2003)27 Sweden | 1 ED | To analyse and describe experiences of being a ‘non-urgent’ patient in ED | Descriptive approach Interviews Convenience sampling | 11 patients | The non-urgent patient experience was interpreted as fragmented. Patients had difficulty being ‘seen or heard’, and were cognizant of the effect of non-urgent problems on nurses’ workloads and perceptions. Patients strived to maintain their own integrity | • | • | |||
O’Brien (2004)17 Canada | 1 ED Level 1 trauma centre | To examine patient perceptions of trauma resuscitation in ED | Interpretive Phenomenology Semi-structured interviews Purposive sampling | 7 adult patients with major trauma as the presenting complaint. | 4 themes results, which were (i) ‘I was scared’, (ii) ‘I felt safe’, (iii) ‘I will be okay’ and (iv) ‘I remember’. System factors were contributed to a positive overall experience | • | • | |||
Olsson (2001)33 Sweden | 1 ED | To explore patients experience of repeat ED attendance | Inductive Interviews Purposive sampling | 10 adult participants Frequent users of ED | Experience of repeat attenders was adversely affected when the patient perceives that use of the ED is inappropriate or when symptoms are belittled | • | • | |||
Olthuis (2014)28 Netherlands | 1 ED | To determine the actual experiences of patients who received ED care | Ethnography Direct observation Convenience sampling | 55 patients in ED | Patients’ ‘concerns’ related to anxiety, expectations, care provision, endurance of symptoms and need to receive or express recognition | • | • | • | ||
Revell (2017)16 New Zealand | 1 ED tertiary centre | To determine the information needs of patients receiving procedural sedation in the ED | Descriptive Interviews Convenience sampling | 8 adult patients who had received procedural sedation | Major themes included (i) safety and trust, (ii) competence and efficiency of staff, (iii) explanations of procedures and progress, (iv) supporting person presence, (v) medico-legal implications and (v) written information | • | • | • | • | |
Rising (2015)22 USA | 2 related EDs | To examine the experience of ED discharge processes through return attenders | Descriptive Semi-structured interviews Convenience sampling | 60 patients who returned within 9 days | Themes included (i) discharge process (wanted more tests/wanted admission/complaint unaddressed), (ii) discharge process (no problem/problem understanding/rushed out/limited explanation) and (ii) prescriptions (did not receive what was wanted) | • | • | • | ||
Shearer (2015)36 Australia | 1 ED | To explore why patient choose to attend a private ED in Australia | Content analysis Semi-structured interviews Purposive sampling | Thirty adult patients | Themes included (i) prior experience of the hospital, (ii) convenient location, (iii) anticipated high-quality care and (iv) anticipated short wait times | • | • | |||
Stuart (2003)23 Australia | 1 ED | To identify ‘consumer expectations’ with respect to the ED | Ethnography Focus groups Purposive sampling | 98 adults including minority ethnic and disabled groups | Major themes were communication triage, waiting area, cultural issues and carers | • | • | • | ||
Vaillancourt (2017)29 Canada | 2 EDs | To define outcomes of ED care that are valued by patients discharged from the ED | Descriptive Semi-structured interviews Convenience sample | 46 adults | Patients valued outcomes that related to 4 themes. These were: (i) understanding the cause and expected trajectory of symptoms, (ii) reassurance, (iii) symptom relief and (iv) having a plan to manage symptoms, resolve the problem or pursue further medical care | • | • | • | ||
Watson (1999)18 USA | 3 EDs | To describe elderly patients’ perceptions of care in the ED | Descriptive In-depth interviews Convenience sampling | 12 elderly patients | 5 themes emerged, which were ‘needs for information’, ‘observations of waiting time’, ‘perceptions of professional competency’, ‘concerns about process and facility design’ and ‘personal tolerance’ | • | • | • | • | |
Watt (2005)34 Canada | Calgary region | To compare public expectations of ED care with healthcare professionals | Descriptive Focus groups and interviews Purposive sampling | 87 adults including 34 recent ED users | 6 themes emerged which included: (i) staff communication with patients, (ii) appropriate waiting times, (iii) the triage process, (iv) information management, (v) quality of care and (vi) improvements to existing services | • | • | |||
Wellstood (2005)35 Canada | 4 EDs across one health system | To gain an understanding of patient perceptions of ED care | Descriptive In-depth interviews Pseudorandomised sampling | 41 adults | Aspects of care most commonly negatively associated with experience were waiting times, patient perceptions of quality of care and staff–patient interactions | • | • | • | ||
Wiman (2007)19 Sweden | Two EDs (1 trauma centre; 1 rural) | To explore trauma patients conceptions of their encounter with the ED team | Inductive Semi-structured interviews Purposive sampling | 23 adult patients with a presenting complaint of trauma | Three phases of trauma patient reception, which were: (i) the instrumental mode, (ii) the attentive mode and (iii) the uncommitted mode. The uncommitted mode could generate emotions of abandonment and dissatisfaction | • |
ED,emergency department.