Table 2

Diagnostic performance of Ottawa SAH Rule

StudyNSens (%)95% CISpec (%)95% CIFNR (%)95% CIFPR (%)95% CI
Perry et al 21 2131100100 to 10015.313.7 to 16.80.00.0 to 0.084.783.2 to 86.3
Bellolio et al 13 454100100 to 1007.65.17 to 10.10.00.0 to 0.092.489.9 to 94.8
Yiangou et al 25 162100100 to 10038.731.4 to 46.60.00.0 to 0.061.053.4 to 68.6
Cheung et al 14 50094.087.4 to 10032.928.5 to 37.26.00.0 to 12.667.162.8 to 71.5
Chu et al 15 137100100 to 10022.415.3 to 29.40.00.0 to 0.077.670.6 to 84.7
Pathan et al 19 145100100 to 10044.336.1 to 52.50.00.0 to 0.055.747.5 to 63.9
Wu et al 24 913100100 to 10037.033.8 to 40.10.00.0 to 0.063.059.9 to 66.2
Perry et al 23 3672100100 to 10012.711.6 to 13.90.00.0 to 0.087.386.1 to 88.4
Pooled (n=8)811499.590.8 to 10023.715.5 to 34.40.490.00 to 9.276.365.6 to 84.5
  • FNR, false negative rate; FPR, false positive rate; N, number; Sens, sensitivity; Spec, specificity.