Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of a chest radiograph-based detection algorithm for aortic injury and to determine if a previously developed clinical prediction rule would improve imaging efficiency. A 3-year single institution retrospective case–control study with 25 cases of aortic injury and 181 controls was conducted. The detection algorithm correctly identified 96% of all cases of aortic injury, and a definitive diagnosis was established within 6h for 80% of the patients. However, its efficiency was marginal, with only one in 400 chest X-rays leading to a positive diagnosis. The previously developed clinical prediction rule was not able to stratify patients into a clinically useful range of injury probability, and thus the prediction rule cannot be used to improve the efficiency of the existing detection algorithm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kerut EK, Kelley G, Falco VC, Ovella T, Diethelm L, Helmcke F (2005) Traumatic deceleration injury of the thoracic aorta. Echocardiography 22:697–704
Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K (2003) Imaging in trauma and critical care. Elsevier, Philadelphia
Parmley LF, Mattingly TW, Manion WC, Jahnke EJ (1958) Nonpenetrating traumatic injury of the aorta. Circulation 17:1086–1101
O’Conner CE (2004) Diagnosing traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 21:414–419
Wintermark M, Wicky S, Schnyder P (2002) Imaging of acute traumatic injuries of the thoracic aorta. Eur Radiol 12:431–442
Fabian TC, Davis KA, Gavant ML et al (1998) Prospective study of blunt aortic injury: helical CT is diagnostic and antihypertensive therapy reduces rupture. Ann Surg 227:666–677
Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Miller BH, White CS, Turney SZ (1996) Traumatic aortic injury: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced thoracic CT-Five-year experience at a major trauma center. Radiology 200:413–422
Gavant ML, Menke PG, Fabian T, Flick PA, Graney MJ, Gold RE (1995) Blunt thoracic aortic rupture: detection with helical CT of the chest. Radiology 197:125–133
Raptopoulos V, Sheiman RG, Phillips DA, Davidoff A, Silva WE (1992) Traumatic aortic tear: screening with chest CT. Radiology 182:667–673
Dyer D, Moore EE, Ilke D et al (2000) Thoracic aortic injury: how predictive is mechanism and is chest computed tomography a reliable screening tool? A prospective study of 1,561 patients. J Trauma 48:673–682
Nagy K, Fabian T, Rodman G, Fulda G, Rodriguez A, Mirvis SE (2000) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of blunt aortic injury. J Trauma 48:1128–1143
American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria. In: URL: http://www.acr.org/s_acr/bin.asp?CID=4078&DID=11744&DOC=FILE.PDF, accessed 4/03/2007
Hunink MGM, Bos JJ (1995) Triage of patients to angiography for detection of aortic rupture after blunt chest trauma: cost-effectiveness analysis of using CT. Am J Roentgenol 165:27–36
Blackmore CC, Zweibel A, Mann FA (2000) Determining risk of traumatic aortic injury: how to optimize imaging strategy. Am J Roentgenol 174:343–347
Blackmore C (2005) Clinical prediction rules in trauma imaging: who, how and why? Radiology 235:371–374
Ho R, Blackmore CC, Bloch R et al (2002) Can we rely on mediastinal widening on chest radiography to identify subjects with aortic injury? Emerg Radiol 9:183–187
Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W, Long WB (1974) The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14:187–196
Ernster VL (1994) Nested case-control studies. Prev Med 23:587–590
Blackmore C, Cummings P (2004) Observational studies in radiology. Am J Roentgenol 183:1203–1208
Sinclair DS (2002) Traumatic aortic injury: an imaging review. Emerg Radiol 9:13–20
Laupacis A, Seklar N, Stiell IG (1997) Clinical prediction rules-A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA 277:488–494
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirkham, J.R., Blackmore, C.C. Screening for aortic injury with chest radiography and clinical factors. Emerg Radiol 14, 211–217 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-007-0636-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-007-0636-7