Elsevier

American Heart Journal

Volume 60, Issue 6, December 1960, Pages 886-897
American Heart Journal

Clinical communication
Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in cases of complete left bundle branch block

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(60)90120-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The electrocadiograms of 13 patients with myocardial infarction and left bundle branch block are analyzed. The diagnosis of the infarction was based on autopsy (6 cases), on typical electrocardiographic changes in some records without the disturbance in conduction (3 cases), and on the typical clinical syndrome and evolutive changes of the S-T segment and T wave (4 cases).

The electrocardiographic changes were compared to those of 87 patients with complete left bundle branch block in whom there was no reason to suspect a myocardial infarction (autopsy in 20 cases), and also to those of 27 patients who were suffering from typical or probable angina pectoris.

All the signs described in the literature as indicating a myocardial infarction in the presence of a left bundle branch block were considered.

The conclusion is that only some changes in the S-T segment and the T wave (particularly if they are evolutive and not explained by the administration of digitalis) indicated with certainty a myocardial infarction. Most of the other signs described, especially those referring to the QRS complex, were found in the absence of a myocardial infarction and, therefore, were not diagnostic.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (18)

  • Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction during Left Bundle Branch Block

    2006, Cardiology Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    This causes (initial) q waves in leads I, aVL, V5, and V6, producing an Qr or qR pattern. A number of old studies reported that the presence of a Q wave in lead 1 was a highly specific and relatively sensitive sign for the diagnosis of anterior infarction in the presence of complete LBBB [27,28]. Cabrera and Friedland [29] described the diagnostic value of late notching of the S wave in leads V3 to V5 (Fig. 3) in anterior infarction in terms of very high sensitivity and specificity.

  • Interobserver agreement in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block

    2000, Annals of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite the importance of early reperfusion, only about 5% of patients with AMI and LBBB receive thrombolytic therapy.1 A number of ECG criteria have been described and studied to help identify AMI in patients with LBBB.6-12 Most recently, Sgarbossa et al13 derived and validated 3 ECG criteria that could be used in an algorithm to diagnose AMI on the initial ECG of such patients.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text