Usefulness of clinical characteristics in predicting the outcome of electrophysiologic studies in unexplained syncope

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(92)90861-RGet rights and content

Abstract

Guidelines for the use of electrophysiologic studies in syncope have not yet been formulated. To confirm the sensitivity and specificity of a previously derived model to predict the results of electrophysiologic testing in syncope, the importance of 6 clinical predictors was assessed in a new data set of 141 consecutive patients with unexplained syncope who were referred for electrophysiologic studies. The 6 predictors were: organic heart disease; premature ventricular beats, sinus bradycardia, first-degree heart block and bundle branch block by electrocardiogram; and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia by Hotter monitor. Organic heart disease and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia by Hotter monitoring were highly sensitive for serious ventricular tachyarrhythmias at electrophysiologic study (sensitivity 100%), whereas sinus bradycardia, first-degree heart block or bundle branch block by electrocardiogram were sensitive for bradyarrhythmic outcomes (sensitivity 79%). Because these variables are so sensitive for serious outcomes of electrophysiologic testing in syncope, invasive studies in patients without these clinical predictors are likely to be of very low diagnostic yield.

References (24)

  • Linzer M, Pontinen M, Gold DT, Divine GW, Felder A, Brooks WB. Impairment of physical and psychosocial function in...
  • CK Kwoh et al.

    Repeated syncope with negative diagnostic evaluation: to pace or not to pace?

    Med Decis Making

    (1984)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Implantable Cardiac Rhythm and Hemodynamic Monitors

      2016, Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy
    • Syncope in Patients with Organic Heart Disease

      2015, Cardiology Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The ability to risk-stratify using electrophysiology testing remains unsettled, especially in patients who do not have ischemic heart disease.77,86–91 Those who have a positive electrophysiology study and syncope have poor outcomes with an ICD92 and a high likelihood of appropriate ICD discharges after implantation.93 According to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society (ACC/AHA/HRS) guidelines,94 an ICD is indicated for patients with syncope who have an electrophysiology study that is positive for ventricular tachyarrhythmia when drug therapy is ineffective, not tolerated, or not preferred; however, an ICD is not indicated for patients with syncope, ventricular tachycardia, but no structural heart disease (idiopathic ventricular tachycardia).

    • Limited yield of hospitalization for the evaluation of syncope in patients presenting to an urban tertiary medical center

      2014, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      An additional 8 patients were found to have a cardiac cause of syncope based on electrophysiologic studies. Abnormalities at electrophysiologic study has been found in 29% to 71% of patients admitted for syncope, with inducible ventricular tachycardia in up to 50% of these patients [8,9,22-29]. Hospitalization of patients with syncope is frequently advocated because of concern for morbidity and mortality.

    • Syncope in patients with organic heart disease

      2013, Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This project was supported in part by BRSG Grant 507-RR05598-22 from the Biomedical Research Support Program, Division of Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, and was presented in part at the annual meetings of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology, Washington, D.C., in May 1991.

    View full text