EMS/Brief report
Violent patients and the prehospital provider

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(05)80106-4Get rights and content

Study objectives:

To estimate the frequency of violence directed toward prehospital providers; to identify the methods used to manage violent patients in the prehospital setting; and to identify the educational, medical, and legal issues in the prehospital management of violent patients.

Design:

A convenient sample survey and a descriptive review of ambulance call reports from June to December 1991.

Setting:

The survey was distributed to registrants at the National Association of EMS Physicians in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in June 1992. Ambulance call reports were reviewed for a metropolitan county with a service population of 60,000.

Interventions:

None.

Results:

Only about 50% of survey respondents reported having protocols for the management of violent patients. Law enforcement officers provided assistance in managing violent patients for 97% of respondents, and 81% reported that a violent patient who refused transport could be arrested. Injury to prehospital providers in the past year was reported by 67% of respondents. Although 67% reported some training in the management of violent patients, only 9% had training by law enforcement officers and only 25% thought that they were trained in assessing the scene for potential violence. Ambulance call report review identified an 0.8% incidence of violent episodes. Weapons were evident in 12% of violent encounters. Transport was refused by 18% of violent patients. In 9% of violent encounters, patients were hypoglycemic. No emergency medical technician injuries were reported for the study period.

Conclusion:

The potential for injury to prehospital providers from violent patients is probably widespread, and no mechanism for identifying injuries or exposure to violent patients currently exists. All systems should have protocols for managing violent patients and for restraint application. Educational sessions for self-defense and assessment of the scene for violence may be indicated.

References (4)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (48)

  • Preventing EMS workplace violence: A mixed-methods analysis of insights from assaulted medics

    2018, Injury
    Citation Excerpt :

    in Australia, paramedics have a higher injury and fatality rate than any other occupational group [7]. Violence and assaults are a significant component of those risks [8–15]. Risk of violent assault might be heightened because EMS personnel work in isolated and uncontrolled environments, are in contact with the public and people in distress, and are associated with possessing valuable or desirable items such as drugs, syringes/needles and expensive equipment [10,16,17].

  • Paramedic student exposure to workplace violence during clinical placements – A cross-sectional study

    2017, Nurse Education in Practice
    Citation Excerpt :

    To date there has been two studies within Australia that have investigated the exposure of paramedics to acts of workplace violence (WPV) and the effects the exposure has had on paramedics (Boyle et al., 2007; Brough, 2005). The literature covering paramedic exposure to WPV dates back to the early 1990s where a study from the U.S.A. by Tintinalli first described the issue (Tintinalli and McCoy, 1993). We will use the previous Australian studies into WPV as comparators due to a lack of international studies into paramedic student exposure to WPV.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text