Elsevier

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volume 20, Issue 9, September 1991, Pages 1017-1019
Annals of Emergency Medicine

Original contribution
Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization in children

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82983-XGet rights and content

Study objective:

To assess the restrictive effects of two spinal immobilization strapping techniques on the respiratory capacity of normal, healthy children.

Design:

Prospective study with each subject serving as his own control.

Participants:

Fifty-one healthy children 6 to 15 years old.

Interventions:

Participants' forced vital capacity (FVC) measurements were first obtained with children standing and lying supine and then in full spinal immobilization using two different strapping configurations, cross straps and lateral straps. Straps were tightened to allow one hand to fit snugly between the strap and child.

Measurements and main results:

Supine FVC was less than upright FVC (P < .001). FVC in spinal immobilization ranged from 41% to 96% of supine FVC (80 ± 9%). There was no difference in FVCs between strapping techniques (P = .83).

Conclusion:

Spinal immobilization significantly reduced respiratory capacity as measured by FVC in healthy patients 6 to 15 years old. There is no significant benefit of one strapping technique over the other.

Cited by (76)

  • Pediatric Trauma

    2023, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
  • Philadelphia versus Miami-J cervical collar's impact on pulmonary function

    2021, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    In two different studies [11],[10], long backboards as immobilization devices significantly reduced pulmonary volumes, including FVC, FEV1, and FEF25–75%. Schafermeyer et al. [14] determined that strapping techniques for immobilization in children significantly reduced FVC. A previous study held at Tabriz University of Medical Science [9] revealed that spirometric parameters significantly increased after the cervical collar removal.

  • Management of acute traumatic spinal cord injuries

    2017, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Appropriate spinal immobilization takes time to apply and could potentially delay transport. Several authors have evaluated the potential morbidity (and mortality) associated with spinal immobilization (Podolsky et al., 1983; Linares et al., 1987; Bauer and Kowalski, 1988; Mawson et al., 1988; Schafermeyer et al., 1991; Hewitt, 1994; Blaylock, 1996; Davies et al., 1996; Black et al., 1998; Kolb et al., 1999; Totten and Sugarman, 1999; Thumbikat et al., 2007). When left in place too long, spinal immobilization may result in pressure ulcers. (

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text