Likelihood Ratio: A Powerful Tool for Incorporating the Results of a Diagnostic Test Into Clinical Decisionmaking☆,☆☆,★
Section snippets
WHAT ARE LIKELIHOOD RATIOS?
The LR is a powerful measure of the accuracy of a diagnostic test. It is the ratio of the probability of a given test result in patients with disease to the probability of the same test result in patients without disease. The LR for a given test result indicates how much that result will raise or lower the probability of disease. It can be used with a nomogram developed by Fagan2 (Figure 2) to establish the posttest probability corresponding to any pretest probability and for any test result.
HOW ARE LIKELIHOOD RATIOS DERIVED FROM PUBLISHED DATA?
LRs are not always directly reported in studies of the accuracy of diagnostic tests. It is, however, usually possible for the reader to calculate them using data commonly reported in such studies.
Authors report the results of studies in a variety of ways. When only 2 test results are possible, they are commonly labeled “positive” versus “negative.” In such cases, the results of studies on accuracy are frequently reported as “sensitivity,” “specificity,” “positive predictive value,” and
HOW ARE LIKELIHOOD RATIOS APPLIED IN CLINICAL DECISIONMAKING?
A diagnostic test that is useful would ideally have either a high LR or a low LR. As the LR approaches 1.0, the utility of the test decreases to zero. Once the LR is known for a given diagnostic test result, use of the nomogram developed by Fagan2 is the simplest method for the clinician to arrive at a posttest probability. Use of the nomogram avoids the necessity of an extra set of computations and streamlines the process of using LRs. In most cases, practitioners formulate their clinical
EXAMPLE
Consider the case of an 8-year-old boy who presents to the ED complaining only of sore throat and fever. On examination he has an erythematous pharynx with mild anterior cervical adenopathy. Because physicians may overestimate GABHS infection,5, 6 you have adopted a strategy that uses diagnostic testing as opposed to empiric treatment for pediatric patients with sore throat.7, 8 You are able to arrange good follow-up for your ED population, and your clinical estimate of the likelihood of a
References (9)
- et al.
Generalized likelihood ratios for quantitative diagnostic test scores
Am J Emerg Med
(1997) - et al.
How many myocardial infarctions should we rule out?
Ann Emerg Med
(1989) Group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: Cost-effective diagnosis and treatment
Ann Emerg Med
(1995)- et al.
User’s guides to the medical literature, III: How to use an article about a diagnostic test
JAMA
(1994)
Cited by (164)
Diagnostic accuracy of the maximal systolic acceleration to detect peripheral arterial disease
2024, Journal of Vascular SurgeryTriage, direct access and Bayesian reasoning in physiotherapy
2024, KinesitherapieClinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Management of Adult Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Ischemic Stroke
2023, Annals of Emergency MedicineDevelopment of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Physical Activity After Total Hip Arthroplasty
2022, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- ☆
Address for reprints: Stephen R Hayden, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, UCSD Medical Center, Mail Code 8676, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92103.
- ☆☆
0196-0644/99/$8.00 + 0
- ★
47/1/97342