Original contribution
Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90051-0Get rights and content

Abstract

In this study, comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard was made with respect to comfort, speed of application, and degree of immobilization. The study was a prospective, nonblinded comparative study conducted at a statewide emergency medical services (EMS) training facility and included a convenience sample of emergency medical technician (EMT) and paramedic students. The vacuum splint was judged to be significantly more comfortable on a 10-point scale than the rigid backboard after subjects had been lying on each device for 30 minutes (P < .001). It was also faster to apply: 131.6 ± 24.3 seconds versus 154.6 ± 22.2 seconds (P < .001). Various measures of immobilization were similar for the two devices. The vacuum splint provided better immobilization of the torso and less slippage on a gradual lateral tilt. The rigid backboard with head blocks was slightly better at immobilizing the head. Vacuum splints offer a significant improvement in comfort over a traditional backboard for the patient with possible spinal injury. They can be applied in reasonable time frames and provide a similar degree of immobilization when compared to a standard rigid backboard.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Presented at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Washington DC, May 22, 1994.

View full text