Original article
Inappropriate attendance in accident and emergency

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-2302(97)90091-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Patients who attend Accident and Emergency (A & E) departments with problems that could be dealt with by their general practitioners (GPs) use time and resources of the department that could be otherwise used for patients with more appropriate needs. Definitions used for inappropriate attendance are drawn from the literature, and the usefulness of the term is discussed in the light of evidence that these patients have logical reasons for attending.

Methods of improving the service offered to these patients are discussed, including emergency nurse practitioners, minor injuries units and GPs in the A & E department. The reluctance of GPs to treat minor injuries in their surgeries is noted.

The implications of changing the service provided in A & E to accommodate or deter patients with primary care problems are discussed.

References (33)

  • K. Burgess

    A dynamic role that improves the service: combining triage and nurse practitioner roles in A&E

    Professional Nurse

    (1992)
  • C. Crowther et al.

    Injury time

    Nursing Times

    (1996)
  • J. Dale et al.

    Primary care in the Accident and Emergency department: I. Prospective identification of patients

    British Medical Journal

    (1995)
  • J. Dale et al.

    Primary can in the Accident and Emergency department: II. Comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctors

    British Medical Journal

    (1995)
  • J. Green et al.

    Health education and the inappropriate use of Accident and Emergency departments: the views of Accident and Emergency nurses

    Health Education Journal

    (1990)
  • M.R. James et al.

    Nurse practitioners in the Accident and Emergency department

    Archives of Emergency Medicine

    (1989)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Why do patients with low back pain seek care at emergency department? A cross-sectional study

      2022, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      This increase in demand leads to longer waiting times, overcrowding, higher costs, and lower quality of care.7–9 Unfortunately, about 30% of patients visiting EDs have non-urgent complaints and could be managed in primary care.7,10–17 Data from Canada18,19 and the USA20,21 show that low back pain (LBP) is one of the main non-urgent conditions contributing to the overcrowding in EDs.

    • ED patients: How nonurgent are they? Systematic review of the emergency medicine literature

      2011, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another problem posed by redirection is that of safety of care, with the risk of inadvertently refusing care to patients truly in need of emergency interventions [10,12,20]. Controversy about the additional costs that would result from nonurgent ED visits also exists [7,8,12,13,22-24]. Richardson and Hwang [1] and Williams [13] have shown that the true cost of nonurgent care in ED is much lower than is widely believed because of the high fixed costs of operating ED and the relatively low marginal costs.

    • The ED is an efficient place to treat ED patients

      2004, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text