Collective ReviewsTrauma scoring systems: a review12
Section snippets
Glasgow Coma Scale
Developed in 1974 by Teasdale and Jennett7 from the University of Glasgow, Scotland, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was the first attempt to quantify severity of head injury. The scale included assessment of three variables (Table 1). The authors chose best motor response to reflect level of CNS function, best verbal response to reflect CNS integrative ability, and eye opening to reflect brainstem function. The admission GCS is predictive of severity of injury.8 It is used as an initial
Trauma Score and revised Trauma Score
In 1981, Champion and associates11 published the Trauma Score (TS) as a system for field triage. At the outset, the authors hypothesized that most early trauma deaths were secondary to injury to one or more of three systems: CNS, cardiovascular system, and respiratory system. They next analyzed a large number of variables representing the functional status of these three systems against a cohort of 1,084 patients to select the most independent predictors of outcomes. The resulting TS included
Injury Severity Scale
The first significant scoring system to be based primarily on anatomic criteria was developed in 1974 by Baker and colleagues15 from Johns Hopkins University. The Injury Severity Scale (ISS) was created to define injury severity for comparative purposes. It is not a field triage system. The best application of ISS comes in providing researchers a control of the variability of trauma severity for evaluating outcomes. Before this system was developed, it was exceedingly difficult for surgeons to
Pediatric Trauma Score
The number one cause of death in the American pediatric population is trauma.25 Most of the field triage tools are not applicable for pediatric trauma victims. For example, normal respiratory rate, heart rate, and systolic blood pressure vary considerably with infancy and childhood. Additionally, the verbal response as used in GCS is obviously inaccurate for young children. For these reasons, Tepas and colleagues26 created the Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS). In their scale, six variables are
Other scoring systems
A number of other scoring systems deserve mention both for completion and because, although not universally adopted, each has contributed to the overall understanding of trauma triage and injury severity. The Triage Index32 and the Illness-Injury Severity Index33 were both excellent early attempts to combine physiologic and anatomic indices for quantifying injury severity that unfortunately never caught on. The CRAMS (circulation, respiration, abdomen, motor, speech)34 and Trauma Triage Rule 35
TRISS
By combining the anatomic criteria of the ISS with the physiologic criteria of the RTS, the “TRISS method” for analyzing trauma data was elucidated.38 Using logistic regression analysis, the TRISS method correlates RTS with ISS to create an S50 isobar on which a 50% survival is predicted. Patient probability of survival is then plotted on the RTS versus ISS graph (Fig. 1). With the isobar in place, survivors who fall above the isobar (unexpected survivors) and those deaths below the isobar
ASCOT
In an attempt to further improve TRISS, Champion and associates43 in 1990, created ASCOT (A Severity Characteristic of Trauma) using the Anatomic Profile.44 Like ISS, the Anatomic Profile is based on AIS scores with some important differences. The Anatomic Profile created four components: component A included head, brain, and spinal cord injuries; component B included thoracic and anterior neck injuries; component C included all other major injuries; and component D included all minor injuries.
Additional statistical terms for understanding TRISS and ASCOT
In addition to grasping the complexities of the logistic regression analysis formulas previously shown, one must also understand a few more terms:
ICD-9 and ICISS systems
The latest injury severity scoring systems to arrive are the ICD-9–based models. The idea to use ICD-9 coded data to create an injury severity scoring system was a response to the amount of resources needed to implement ISS-based systems. To classify patients by AIS, a dedicated trauma registry and staff to encode, enter, and police the data is required. The AIS90 scoring is complicated and requires significant knowledge and training. Many major urban trauma centers have dedicated staff who
Overtriage and undertriage
All scoring and triage systems are susceptible to the problem of overtriage and undertriage. Overtriage is defined as the number of patients with minor injuries who are transported to a specialized trauma center. Undertriage is defined as the number of patients with severe injuries who were inappropriately triaged to nontrauma centers. There is general agreement that efforts to minimize undertriage to less than 5% to 10% at the expense of increased overtriage is desirable.57, 58 The American
Population data sets
Predictions of injury severity are only as good as the data entered and are not necessarily always representative of the patient. It is paramount to understand that prediction of outcomes cannot apply to clinical decision-making for an individual patient. These survival probabilities and triage criteria are based on the evaluation of large data sets. It is inappropriate to predict outcomes of the individual patient or to initiate treatment based on predicted outcomes. A clinician must
References (63)
Scoring systems and triage from the field
Emerg Med Clin North Am
(1993)Injury severity scalesOverview and directions for future research
Am J Emerg Med
(1984)- et al.
Assessment of coma and impaired consciousnessA practical scale
Lancet
(1974) - et al.
The trauma score as applied to penetrating trauma
Ann Emerg Med
(1984) - et al.
Application of the trauma score in the prehospital setting
Ann Emerg Med
(1985) Overview of trauma
Surg Clin North Am
(1982)- et al.
The pediatric trauma score as a predictor of injury severity in the injured child
J Pediatr Surg
(1987) - et al.
A comparison of the Trauma Score, the Revised Trauma Score, and the Pediatric Trauma Score
Ann Emerg Med
(1989) CRAMS scaleField triage of trauma victims
Ann Emerg Med
(1982)- et al.
Ineffectiveness of the trauma score and the CRAMS scale for accurately triaging patients to trauma centers
Ann Emerg Med
(1985)
Injury severity determinationRequirements, approaches, and applications
Ann Emerg Med
A critical analysis of acutely injured children managed in an adult level 1 trauma center
J Pediatr Surg
Decreasing the cost of trauma careA system of secondary inhospital triage
Ann Emerg Med
Systems of trauma careA study of two counties
Arch Surg
History and current status of trauma scoring systems
Arch Surg
Trauma systems and public policy
Annu Rev Publ Health
DRG reimbursement for traumaThe demise of the trauma center
J Trauma
Measuring the outcome from head injuries
J Neurosurg
Prognosis of patients with severe head injury
Neurosurgery
Efficacy of the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale in trauma triage
J Trauma
The trauma score
Crit Care Med
A revision of the trauma score
J Trauma
The injury severity scoreA method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care
J Trauma
Rating the severity of tissue damageThe Abbreviated Scale
JAMA
PanelCurrent status of trauma severity indices
J Trauma
Rating AIS severity using emergency department sheets versus inpatient charts
J Trauma
Research in trauma outcomes using the MTOS database
AHCPR Grant HS 06721
Measuring injury severitytime for a change?
J Trauma
Cited by (116)
What is counted counts: An innovative linkage of police, hospital, and spatial data for transportation injury prevention
2022, Journal of Safety ResearchCitation Excerpt :To assess geographic vulnerability we used a binary regional proxy measure of “Communities of Concern” based on vulnerable census tracts– arrived at by a compound calculation taking into account neighborhoods with high concentrations of minority, low-income, transit-dependent, non-English speaking, disabled or older individuals (“MTC Communities of Concern Factor and Predominant Populations (Census 2010) Explorer, 2018). Linkage allows comparison of injury severity classified in police data to both clinically-assessed Injury Severity Score (ISS), a correlate of trauma severity, and hospital admission (Senkowski & McKenney, 1999). We use the criterion of ISS > 15 as a proxy measure for critical injury, widely accepted in trauma literature (Senkowski & McKenney, 1999).
Evaluation of the sequential organ failure assessment score and newly introduced criteria – Traumasis - in traffic collision patients
2022, American Journal of Emergency MedicineTrauma in Pregnancy
2019, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North AmericaMaxillofacial injuries in patients with major trauma
2018, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :These studies examined all maxillofacial injuries that presented over a particular time period, many of which were isolated. There are limited data, however, about the maxillofacial injuries that present as a component of major trauma, which is an important subgroup of admissions as mortality may be as high as 10%.7 In recent years, efforts to improve outcomes have included the introduction of national trauma networks and registries.
- 1
No competing interests declared.
- 2
Some introductory material in this article appears in Shatz D, Kirton OC, McKenney MG, Civetta JM. Manual of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Philadelphia: WB Saunders (October).