Elsevier

The American Journal of Medicine

Volume 128, Issue 12, December 2015, Pages 1322-1324.e3
The American Journal of Medicine

Clinical research study
Inadequacies of Physical Examination as a Cause of Medical Errors and Adverse Events: A Collection of Vignettes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Oversights in the physical examination are a type of medical error not easily studied by chart review. They may be a major contributor to missed or delayed diagnosis, unnecessary exposure to contrast and radiation, incorrect treatment, and other adverse consequences. Our purpose was to collect vignettes of physical examination oversights and to capture the diversity of their characteristics and consequences.

Methods

A cross-sectional study using an 11-question qualitative survey for physicians was distributed electronically, with data collected from February to June of 2011. The participants were all physicians responding to e-mail or social media invitations to complete the survey. There were no limitations on geography, specialty, or practice setting.

Results

Of the 208 reported vignettes that met inclusion criteria, the oversight was caused by a failure to perform the physical examination in 63%; 14% reported that the correct physical examination sign was elicited but misinterpreted, whereas 11% reported that the relevant sign was missed or not sought. Consequence of the physical examination inadequacy included missed or delayed diagnosis in 76% of cases, incorrect diagnosis in 27%, unnecessary treatment in 18%, no or delayed treatment in 42%, unnecessary diagnostic cost in 25%, unnecessary exposure to radiation or contrast in 17%, and complications caused by treatments in 4%. The mode of the number of physicians missing the finding was 2, but many oversights were missed by many physicians. Most oversights took up to 5 days to identify, but 66 took longer. Special attention and skill in examining the skin and its appendages, as well as the abdomen, groin, and genitourinary area could reduce the reported oversights by half.

Conclusions

Physical examination inadequacies are a preventable source of medical error, and adverse events are caused mostly by failure to perform the relevant examination.

Section snippets

Methods

We designed an 11-question, qualitative survey for physicians, who were asked to send us vignettes of known instances of oversights in physical examination and to answer related multiple choice questions. The study was approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board; the detailed instructions to the respondent and the questionnaire can be found online at www.surveymonkey.com/s/8S6DL7V.

A link to the questionnaire was sent to approximately 5000 physicians of diverse specialties

Results

Of the 263 responses received, 55 were excluded; of the 208 remaining responses, 27 were corrected by the criteria described in Methods.

Sixty-three percent of vignettes reported that the oversight was caused by a failure to perform the physical examination; 14% reported that the correct physical examination sign was elicited but misinterpreted. Eleven percent reported that the relevant sign was missed or not sought, and 12% reported “other” as the cause of the deficiency.

Consequence of the

Discussion

Recent publications describe the decline of physical examination skills.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Our study highlights the consequences and suggests that many adverse events are preventable. Our survey suggests that the major cause for error is simply that the examination is not performed.12, 13 In addition to diagnostic consequences, approximately half of the vignettes report treatment consequences. Most oversights pertained to a limited number of overlookers, suggesting that some errors may be

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Ralph Horwitz, MD, for his encouragement of the First Stanford Symposium on Bedside Medicine in 2009, and for his helpful discussions in planning this study.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (151)

  • Demise of the USMLE Step-2 CS exam: Rationalizing a way forward

    2023, Journal of the National Medical Association
  • Orientation and mobility control of 4HCB organic film for flexible X-ray detectors with high performance

    2023, Journal of Materials Science and Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Metal oxide and inorganic semiconductor devices (such as silicon) can approximate the dose at the site of irradiated, but, these devices can be invasive when rely on implanted in the patient's body [10]. Also the most high-Z detector are rigid, and these detectors can cause vignetting problems [11]. Unlike conventional solid state X-ray detectors, the mechanical flexibility and intrinsic compatibility of OSC detectors with flexible substrates allow them to be processed into large-area pixelated detector matrixes, and possibly onto curved objects or imaged in a tight space [12].

View all citing articles on Scopus

Funding: None.

Conflict of Interest: None.

Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript.

View full text