Health policy and clinical practice/original research
Forecasting Emergency Department Crowding: A Discrete Event Simulation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.12.011Get rights and content

Study objective

To develop a discrete event simulation of emergency department (ED) patient flow for the purpose of forecasting near-future operating conditions and to validate the forecasts with several measures of ED crowding.

Methods

We developed a discrete event simulation of patient flow with evidence from the literature. Development was purely theoretical, whereas validation involved patient data from an academic ED. The model inputs and outputs, respectively, are 6-variable descriptions of every present and future patient in the ED. We validated the model by using a sliding-window design, ensuring separation of fitting and validation data in time series. We sampled consecutive 10-minute observations during 2006 (n=52,560). The outcome measures—all forecast 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours into the future from each observation—were the waiting count, waiting time, occupancy level, length of stay, boarding count, boarding time, and ambulance diversion. Forecasting performance was assessed with Pearson's correlation, residual summary statistics, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

The correlations between crowding forecasts and actual outcomes started high and decreased gradually up to 8 hours into the future (lowest Pearson's r for waiting count=0.56; waiting time=0.49; occupancy level=0.78; length of stay=0.86; boarding count=0.79; boarding time=0.80). The residual means were unbiased for all outcomes except the boarding time. The discriminatory power for ambulance diversion remained consistently high up to 8 hours into the future (lowest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.86).

Conclusion

By modeling patient flow, rather than operational summary variables, our simulation forecasts several measures of near-future ED crowding, with various degrees of good performance.

Introduction

The Institute of Medicine recently noted that emergency department (ED) crowding represents an obstacle to the safe and timely delivery of health care.1, 2 Previous research has linked ED crowding with adverse patient outcomes,3, 4, 5, 6, 7 impaired access to care,8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and decreased profitability.16, 17, 18

A substantial body of literature has focused on techniques for measuring the phenomenon of ED crowding, with the intent of allowing care providers, administrators, and policymakers to better manage the problem.19, 20, 21, 22, 23 At least 2 major problems are associated with measuring ED crowding. First, the lack of a standard crowding definition makes it difficult for unified progress to be made because different interpretations exist for what the term “crowding” should imply. A recent editorial emphasized the need for measuring ED patient flow, rather than measuring crowding itself.24

Second, proposed measures of ED crowding have tended to focus on the present crowding state, and reports of forecasting the future crowding state have been relatively recent.25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 Predictions of the near-future status of the ED would arguably have substantial value because they could trigger early interventions designed to lessen the burden of crowding situations before they arise.31, 32, 33, 34, 35 A focus on forecasting the future, in addition to monitoring the present, may represent the difference between being reactive and being proactive in managing ED crowding.

Both of the above research gaps may be addressed by using a novel application of computer simulation in the ED. We attempt to demonstrate that, with a sufficiently detailed simulation of ED patient flow, near-future forecasts of almost any crowding measurement of interest may be obtained from a single model. The feasibility of developing an ED simulation model has already been well established.36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 Previous studies have focused on using simulation to evaluate the effect of hypothetical changes in ED operations. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have explored the ability of an ED simulation to serve as a generalized, real-time forecasting model.

The first goal of this study was to develop a computer simulation for the specific purpose of real-time forecasting of ED operating conditions. The second goal was to validate the ability of the simulation to forecast several measures of ED crowding.

Section snippets

Theoretical Model of the Problem

Our study was based on the following premise: With a simulation model that expresses ED crowding in terms of individual patients and their characteristics, perhaps we could forecast any outcome measure of interest. The conceptual process of obtaining forecasts from an ED simulation is outlined in Figure 1. The model would consist of a set of theoretical distributions governing patient flow, with parameters calculated from historical patient data. The model would be initialized with a detailed

Results

A total of 57,995 patients visited the adult ED during the study period, of which 4,776 patients were excluded (8.2%). The medians and interquartile ranges for each continuous outcome measure during the 2006 calendar year were the following: waiting count=2 patients (1 to 6), waiting time=13 minutes (0 to 50), occupancy level=83% (63 to 95), length of stay=6.4 hours (4.4 to 9.1), boarding count=10 patients (5 to 16), and boarding time=6.8 hours (3.1 to 10.5). A total of 188 ambulance diversion

Limitations

One potential limitation of this study is the narrow purpose for which the ForecastED simulation was intended. We developed and validated it for the sole purpose of forecasting near-future operational measures in the ED. We intentionally kept the purpose narrow because an effort to create an all-purpose simulation of ED patient flow might have compromised one or more of our design goals. Its use for other common applications of simulation, such as evaluating long-term effects of proposed

Discussion

We have designed and implemented ForecastED, a discrete event simulation that uses patient flow to predict near-future ED operational measures. The findings indicate that the distributions used to represent the model's random processes closely fit the observed data. The simulation forecasts correlated well with the actual operational measures at 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours in the future. This correlation equaled or exceeded the inherent autocorrelation of the data across all outcome measures and

References (61)

  • D.N. Kyriacou et al.

    A 5-year time study analysis of emergency department patient care efficiency

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1999)
  • R. Beveridge et al.

    Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1999)
  • M.J. Schull et al.

    Emergency department contributors to ambulance diversion: a quantitative analysis

    Ann Emerg Med

    (2003)
  • L.I. Solberg et al.

    Emergency department crowding: consensus development of potential measures

    Ann Emerg Med

    (2003)
  • Hospital-based Emergency Care: At the Breaking Point

    (2006)
  • A.L. Kellermann

    Crisis in the emergency department

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • O. Miro et al.

    Decreased health care quality associated with emergency department overcrowding

    Eur J Emerg Med

    (1999)
  • C.E. Begley et al.

    Emergency department diversion and trauma mortality: evidence from Houston, Texas

    J Trauma

    (2004)
  • U. Hwang et al.

    The effect of emergency department crowding on the management of pain in older adults with hip fracture

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2006)
  • P.C. Sprivulis et al.

    The association between hospital overcrowding and mortality among patients admitted via Western Australian emergency departments

    Med J Aust

    (2006)
  • D.B. Richardson

    Increase in patient mortality at 10 days associated with emergency department overcrowding

    Med J Aust

    (2006)
  • D.W. Baker et al.

    Patients who leave a public hospital emergency department without being seen by a physicianCauses and consequences

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • M.J. Schull et al.

    Emergency department overcrowding and ambulance transport delays for patients with chest pain

    CMAJ

    (2003)
  • S. Liu et al.

    Impact of critical bed status on emergency department patient flow and overcrowding

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2003)
  • M.J. Schull et al.

    Emergency department gridlock and out-of-hospital delays for cardiac patients

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2003)
  • S.K. Polevoi et al.

    Factors associated with patients who leave without being seen

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2005)
  • B.H. Rowe et al.

    Characteristics of patients who leave emergency departments without being seen

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2006)
  • T. Falvo et al.

    The financial impact of ambulance diversions and patient elopements

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2007)
  • S.L. Bernstein et al.

    Development and validation of a new index to measure emergency department crowding

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2003)
  • T.J. Reeder et al.

    The overcrowded emergency department: a comparison of staff perceptions

    Acad Emerg Med

    (2003)
  • Cited by (184)

    • Dynamic scheduling of patients in emergency departments

      2023, European Journal of Operational Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supervising editor: David J. Magid, MD, MPH

    Author contributions: NH and DA conceived the study. All authors contributed substantially to the study design. IJ and DA obtained research funding. NH implemented the software and collected the data. NH and CZ performed the statistical analysis. NH drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. NH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

    Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article, that may create any potential conflict of interest. See the Manuscript Submission Agreement in this issue for examples of specific conflicts covered by this statement. Dr. Hoot was supported by the National Library of Medicine grant LM07450-02 and National Institute of General Medical Studies grant T32 GM07347. The research was also supported by the National Library of Medicine grant R21 LM009002-01. This project is an academic endeavor. It was supported by federal funding, as noted above, and there was no corporate funding. There are no current plans to commercialize this research that would cause any conflicts of interest.

    Publication dates: Available online April 30, 2008.

    Reprints not available from the authors.

    View full text