Elsevier

Injury

Volume 35, Issue 10, October 2004, Pages 982-985
Injury

Wet cement remains a poorly recognised cause of full-thickness skin burns

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.010Get rights and content

Abstract

In 1993 we published a paper stating that wet construction cement is a poorly recognised cause of full-thickness burns [Injury 24 (1993) 615]. Ten years since publication we re-evaluated cement burns to ascertain if there had been any changes in awareness and incidence.

All cement related burns assessed at this unit were reviewed over a three and a half year period. Postal questionnaires were sent to all those affected.

Cement burns accounted for 2.2% of referrals to the Burns Unit during this studied period as compared to 1% during the original study. Fifty-one percent of patients stated they were unaware of the risk of cement burns and took no precautions. Eighty-six percent of the burns involved the lower limb. Fifty-three percent of burns affected professional users. Fifty percent had full-thickness involvement with 21% requiring operation. Eighty-eight percent of patients did not notice any warnings on the cement bag or delivery docket and 95% felt warnings should be larger and more obvious.

This study has shown that cement burns may have resulted from shortcomings in the information and warnings provided to customers by cement manufacturers.

Introduction

In 1993 we published a paper stating that wet construction cement is a poorly recognised cause of full-thickness burns.1 Ninety-five percent of patients stated that they were unaware of the potential for cement to cause burns. Only 40% took precautions and none had noticed any warnings on the cement bag or delivery docket. At the time the British Cement Association was asked to comment on this paper. They stated that they were aware of the serious risk of burns and that its members produce bags that carry a warning that advises simple first aid measures in case of contact with skin or eyes. This complies with the classification, Packaging and Labelling of Dangerous Substances Regulations, 1984. We suggested although complying with regulations, these warnings are ineffective in alerting both professionals and the general public to the burn dangers of cement.

Ten years on we decided to re-evaluate cement burns and ascertain if there had been any changes in awareness and incidence of cement burns since the last paper was published.

Section snippets

Method

All patients admitted to the burns unit with cement burns between January 1998 and June 2001 were included in the study. The patient’s notes were reviewed and each contacted by means of a postal survey. A further questionnaire was sent to all those who did not initially reply.

Results

There were 3194 referrals to the burns unit during the studied period (January 1998–June 2001). Cement burns accounted for 71 referrals (2.2%). During the last study period (1987–1991), 24 patients with cement burns contributed to a total of 2795 referrals (1%).

The annual variation of the period January 1998–December 2000 is shown on Fig. 1. Sixty-seven patients were male and four female. The median age was 36 years (range 22 months to 62 years).

Sixty-six patients (93%) had detailed records of

Discussion

Wet cement damages skin in three ways:

  • 1.

    Allergic dermatitis as a reaction to its hexavalent chromate ions.

  • 2.

    As abrasions caused by the gritty nature of the coarse and fine aggregate in the cement.

  • 3.

    Wet cement has a pH of 12.5 causing alkali burns.

The severity of the burn depends on the amount of abrasion created by the cement aggregate and the duration of cement contact.

Unfortunately the ability of cement to cause such injury is not well recognised, even by professional users. Over half of the

Conclusion

The incidence of cement burns has increased the last 10 years and now accounts for 2.2% of admissions to this burns unit. One in five required operation. This study has shown that cement burns may have resulted from shortcomings in the information and warnings provided to customers by cement manufacturers. Eighty-eight percent of patients did not notice any warnings on the cement bag or delivery docket and 95% felt warnings should be larger and more obvious. If this prevents even a small

Comment from the Concrete Trade Association

This paper has been reviewed by the Concrete Trade Association. They stated that they were disappointed that despite efforts to provide clear guidance on the risks of using cement they have had no impact on reducing cement burns including those to so-called ‘professional’ users. They accept a social responsibility to try to improve the situation. This paper has been sent to all their members and will be discussed at their next meeting. Following this review the association will endeavour to

References (0)

Cited by (18)

  • Deep alkali burns: Evaluation of a two-step surgical strategy

    2018, Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthetique
  • Is it time for a change in the approach to chemical burns? The role of Diphoterine <sup>®</sup> in the management of cutaneous and ocular chemical injuries

    2017, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    They cause injury by producing a chemical interaction that can lead to extensive tissue destruction and extreme pain. Injuries may not be immediately obvious, and there can be a delay in presentation.1 These injuries account for only 3% of all burns but lead to approximately 30% of burn deaths,2 usually secondary to ingestion in children.

  • Irritant Contact Dermatitis: Clinical Aspects

    2014, Applied Dermatotoxicology: Clinical Aspects
  • Evaluation of the burn wound: Management decisions

    2012, Total Burn Care: Fourth Edition
  • Chemical burns: Pathophysiology and treatment

    2010, Burns
    Citation Excerpt :

    On the other hand, calcium oxide dust may aerosolise and become an irritant to the respiratory tract. Some studies document that most patients who suffer cement burns ignore the potential of wet cement to cause injury [28]. Information and use of adequate protective materials are essential in the prevention of cement burns.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text