ReviewRisk factors that predict mortality in patients with blunt chest wall trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction
Blunt chest wall trauma does not involve any opening of the chest wall and can vary in severity from minor bruising or an isolated rib fracture to severe crush injuries on both sides of the thorax leading to potentially fatal respiratory compromise.52 Blunt chest wall trauma accounts for over 10% of all trauma patients presenting to emergency departments worldwide.53 Research has highlighted significant morbidity and mortality for the blunt chest wall trauma patient, with reported mortality ranging from 4 to 20%.38, 53 The patient with severe thoracic injuries will be managed in the Emergency Department by trauma and various surgical teams and intervention is dictated by the resuscitation protocol of the department.8 Disposition of chest injury patients from the Emergency Department is therefore straightforward when the patient requires immediate surgery or supportive mechanical ventilation.8 When the injury is not as severe, or associated injuries are not present, deciding which blunt chest wall trauma patients require a higher level of clinical input can be difficult. Clinical symptoms are not considered an accurate predictor of outcome following non-life threatening blunt chest wall trauma.15
Pape et al. developed a scoring system for guiding initial clinical decision making in the blunt chest trauma patient with multiple associated injuries however there are currently no evidence-based guidelines to guide patient management in the blunt chest wall trauma population with no associated injuries.35 Ahmad et al. suggested that a scoring system needs to be designed to evaluate the degree of injury following blunt chest trauma.1 Methods are required to assist identification of the patient who presents with non-immediate life threatening blunt chest wall trauma, but will develop complications within the following 24–72 h.1, 15 Evidence suggests that these patients can deteriorate up to a week after initial presentation to the Emergency Department28, 41 and elderly blunt chest wall trauma patients are particularly at risk of delayed deterioration.3, 42 The appropriate management of the blunt chest wall trauma patient with no immediate life threatening injuries has been an area of interest in previous research which has highlighted the difficulty in identifying the high risk patient in this population.30, 31, 40 Blecher et al. described a group of chest trauma patients who were considered suitable for ward management by the Emergency Department, of which 10% went on to require Intensive Care Unit admission with associated longer lengths of stay and higher rehabilitation requirements.8
Risk factors for mortality in the blunt chest wall trauma patient have been investigated previously in the literature and various outcome measures are used including mortality, morbidity and different aspects of resource consumption. When provided, definitions for these outcome measures vary in each study, leading to questionable validity and difficulty in comparison of studies. Given the inconsistent definitions for these outcomes, this study focussed specifically on the risk factors for mortality in blunt chest wall trauma patients as this is the most consistently measured and reported outcome measure. The aim of this review was to summarise the risk factors for mortality in the blunt chest wall trauma patient in order to assist in the identification of the high risk patient and facilitate decisions regarding the required appropriate level of care. For the purpose of this study, we defined blunt chest wall trauma as blunt chest injury resulting in chest wall contusion or rib fractures, with or without non-immediate life-threatening lung injury.
Section snippets
Search strategy
All methods used in this review followed the CRD13 PRISMA,34 and MOOSE47 guidelines. A broad search strategy was used in order to include all relevant studies. The search filter was used for Medline and Embase Databases and the Cochrane Library from their introduction until June 2010. The search term combinations were Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms, text words and word variants for chest trauma. These were combined with relevant terms for aetiological factors. The search terms are
Results
A total of 4326 citations were identified from the electronic searches and 25 citations through other sources. Following screening of the titles and abstracts using the two-step process, a total of 73 full-text citations was retrieved for detailed evaluation. No further citations were identified through the searches of grey literature. The experts in the field who responded suggested studies for inclusion that had been identified in the original search. Two non-English language studies were
Discussion
This systematic review was conducted in order to summarise the risk factors for mortality in blunt chest wall trauma patients who can normally be safely discharged from the emergency department, but will develop later complications. Klein et al. stated that controversy remains regarding methods to identify the mild to moderate blunt chest wall trauma group who develop late complications.28 Studies investigating only severe blunt chest trauma patients, such as intra-thoracic injuries were
Limitations
Systematic reviews of observational studies remain a contentious issue in research. Identification of potential forms of bias is important in observational studies, which are sensitive to publication bias and confounding. The results of this review are subject to publication bias as the studies with significant findings are more readily published in peer-reviewed journals than those without.21 There is also a tendency amongst authors to only present significant results.21, 47 The search
Conclusions
Patients who present with mild to moderate blunt chest wall trauma can normally be safely discharged from the emergency department with adequate pain control and education on pulmonary hygiene. A percentage of this patient group will develop late complications however no current guidelines exist to assist the emergency department physician in the recognition of this high risk blunt chest wall trauma patient population. In order to develop such guidelines or a risk stratification tool, the risk
Conflict of interest statement
The three authors of this study state that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding source
The Welsh Intensive Care Society: no involvement in study.
Acknowledgement
The Emergency Department, Morriston Hospital, Swansea.
References (53)
- et al.
Assessment of severity of chest trauma: is there an ideal scoring system?
Injury
(2010) - et al.
Blunt chest trauma: utility of radiological evaluation and effect on treatment patterns
Am J Emerg Med
(2006) - et al.
Non-life-threatening blunt chest trauma: appropriate investigation and treatment
Am J Emerg Med
(1997) - et al.
Morbidity from rib fractures increases after age 45
J Am Coll Surg
(2003) - et al.
Risk factors for 24-hour mortality after traumatic rib fractures owing to motor vehicle accidents: a nationwide population based study
Ann Thorac Surg
(2009) - et al.
Prognostic factors in chest trauma: a prospective study of 500 patients
Cir Esp
(2010) - et al.
Paediatric and adult thoracic trauma: age-related impact on presentation and outcome
Ann Thorac Surg
(1994) - et al.
Rib radiographs for trauma: useful or wasteful?
Ann of Emerg Med
(1986) - et al.
Age-adjusted outcomes in traumatic flail chest injuries in the elderly
Am Surg
(2000) - et al.
Blunt chest trauma in the elderly: how cardiopulmonary disease effects outcome
Am Surg
(2000)