Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 61, Issue 11, December 2005, Pages 2363-2373
Social Science & Medicine

“Unless you went in with your head under your arm”: Patient perceptions of emergency room visits

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.033Get rights and content

Abstract

There is increasing concern in Canada regarding growing pressures on emergency room care. Frequent media reports call attention to overcrowding, lengthy waiting times and the re-routing of ambulances due to the closure of emergency rooms during periods of overcrowding. Much of this information, however, is anecdotal. As such, little is known about patients’ experiences in emergency rooms in Canada. The purpose of this study is to explore patients’ perceptions of their most recent emergency room visit. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 41 men and women from two socially distinct neighbourhoods in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Much of the previous work on experiences in emergency room care is international in scope and uses quantitative methods to examine patient satisfaction with emergency care. This study considers patient experiences more broadly and looks beyond satisfaction to examine reasons for seeking emergency room care and the factors that shape experiences. The findings show that most patients describe their experiences in negative terms. The aspects of emergency room care that were most often linked with negative experiences were waiting times, patient perceptions of the quality of care received and staff–patient interactions. The findings are discussed in the context of recent health care reforms in Canada, which we argue have not addressed adequately the ‘crisis’ in emergency rooms.

Introduction

The emergency room (ER) is an important component of health care systems. It is the site where individuals receive care in emergency situations but also where primary care services are often provided when doctors’ offices and health clinics are closed. ERs may also be the first contact point for those without family physicians. In Canada, there has been increasing concern regarding the mounting pressures on ERs. Frequent media reports document increases in wait times, overcrowding and compromised quality of care in ERs. In September 2000, a newspaper story attributed the death of a young man living in Toronto, Ontario to the rerouting of his ambulance from a local hospital to one that was much further away due to overcrowding in the local hospital ER (Toronto Star, September 11, 2000). In another case, a Toronto, Ontario man was sent to Peterborough, Ontario, a 150 km distance from Toronto, because at the time all Toronto hospitals were closed to ambulance cases (Guelph Mercury, December 29, 1999). From these and similar stories, an ‘ER crisis’ seems evident (see also Hamilton Spectator, January 13, 2000; Toronto Star, January 13, 2000; Toronto Star, June 8, 2001). While there is much anecdotal evidence of the existence of an ER crisis in across Canada, there have been few studies to examine the state of ER care in Canada and even fewer that explore patients’ perspectives of care received in these settings.

Hospitals are an important part of the Canadian health care system and this is reflected in national and provincial health expenditures. In 2001, approximately 30% ($32 billion) of total health expenditures in Canada was spent on hospitals (CIHI, 2004). Similarly, in the province of Ontario, approximately 27% ($11.5 billion) of total health expenditures went to hospitals (CIHI, 2004). ERs are a critical component of the Canadian health care system in general and the hospital system in particular. In the year 2000, the total number of visits to ERs in the province of Ontario was 5,272,803, which represents approximately half of the total population of Ontario (Ehrlich, Chhetry, Emo, Nelligan, & King, 2002). The Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, which governs four of the five hospitals located in the City of Hamilton, Ontario, has an annual budget of $553,571,024 of which 3% is allocated to ER services (Berti, 2004). Given the essential role that ERs play in providing urgent and primary care, the financial resources that are invested into hospitals each year, the high volume of care they receive each year, and the potential crisis in ER settings across the country, patient experiences represent an important but undocumented aspect of ERs. In fact, the evidence suggesting that ERs are facing increasing pressures is largely anecdotal and the research examining individuals’ perceptions and experiences in ER settings is limited. In light of the current situation, this study explores patient experiences in ER settings in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada to begin to understand both patients’ perceptions of the care received in ERs but also the factors that shape their ER experiences.

Section snippets

Background

Patient experiences in ER settings is an under researched area in Canada. Much of the research that examines user attitudes towards ER care has been conducted in other international settings, mainly the United States (US) and United Kingdom (UK). Further, the majority of research focuses on assessing patient satisfaction using quantitative methods and global measures of satisfaction.1

Research setting and methods

The research was conducted in the city of Hamilton, Ontario, which is located on the western tip of Lake Ontario, about 60 km west of Toronto. The population at the time of the study was approximately 380,000. Hamilton has five hospitals, four of which have ERs that operate 24 h a day, 7 days a week, and one urgent care centre that is open daily from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. each day. The St. Joseph's Health Care System operates one emergency department and the urgent care centre. Combined, they see

Results

Most of the respondents discussed a previous visit for themselves. Of the 42 experiences discussed, 25 of them were presented by individuals describing their own experiences in the ER. The 17 other experiences were visits in which the participants accompanied someone else, most often another family member (i.e. spouse/partner, parent, child), to the ER. The reasons why people sought care from an ER varied from very serious to non-urgent. In classifying the reasons for visits, the triage

Discussion and conclusion

In contrast with the mainly quantitative research in this field of study, the results of this qualitative study demonstrate how some individuals perceive the care received in ER settings as negative. Waiting times, perceptions of the quality of care received, and staff–patient interactions were factors that shaped individual experiences of ERs in Hamilton, Ontario. Furthermore, the results of this study demonstrate that individuals perceive the care received in ER settings as negative. These

Acknowledgements

This paper gratefully acknowledges the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for funding the study under its Society, Culture and the Health of Canadians strategic area. The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their extremely insightful comments and suggestions. Finally we would like to thank the residents of Hamilton, Ontario who participated in the research.

References (60)

  • W. Watson et al.

    Elderly patients’ perceptions of care in the emergency department

    Journal of Emergency Nursing

    (1999)
  • J. Baxter et al.

    “Something happened”: The relevance of the risk society for describing the sitting process for a municipal landfill

    Geografiska Annaler

    (1999)
  • G. Becker et al.

    Socioeconomic status and dissatisfaction with health care among chronically ill African Americans

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2003)
  • F. Béland et al.

    Patterns of visits to hospital-based emergency rooms

    Social Science & Medicine

    (1998)
  • Berti, K. (2004). Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation. Manager of Financial Planning. Personal...
  • H. Bjorvell et al.

    Patients’ perceptions of the health care received in an emergency department

    Annals of Emergency Medicine

    (1991)
  • E. Boudreaux et al.

    Emergency department patient satisfaction: Examining the role of acuity

    Academic Emergency Medicine

    (2003)
  • M. Burnett et al.

    Use of the emergency department for nonurgent care during regular business hours

    Canadian Medical Association Journal

    (1996)
  • J. Campbell et al.

    Age, gender, socioeconomic, and ethnic differences in patients’ assessments of primary health care

    Quality in Health Care

    (2001)
  • Canadian community health survey public-use micro data file

    (2001)
  • Joint position statement on emergency department overcrowding

    Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine

    (2001)
  • Emergency medicine challenge and change: Submission to the commission on the future of health care in Canada

    (2001)
  • Access to acute care in the setting of emergency department overcrowding

    Journal of the Association of Emergency Physicians

    (2003)
  • Health expenditures by use of funds, by year, by source of finance, by province/territory and Canada, 1975–2003

    (2004)
  • P. Cleary et al.

    Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care

    Inquiry

    (1988)
  • A. Drummond et al.

    Nurse practitioners in the emergency department: A discussion paper

    Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine

    (2003)
  • K. Dunn

    Interviewing

  • A. Ehrlich et al.

    Primary health care in the east downtown neighbourhoods of Hamilton

    (2002)
  • C. Gray

    Hospital crisis? What crisis?

    Canadian Medical Association Journal

    (2000)
  • Guelph Mercury (December 29, 1999). Patient sent out of Toronto due to no room in...
  • Cited by (31)

    • Patients' experiences of psychiatric care in emergency departments: A secondary analysis

      2016, International Emergency Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, care encounters can be stressful for both persons seeking treatment and those who are providing it (Clarke et al., 2007; Slade et al., 2010), leading to less than optimal care outcomes for persons with mental illness and negative experiences for providers (Plant and White, 2013; Zun, 2012). Importantly, negative provider attitudes resulting from these encounters can exacerbate distress for patients, furthering the cycle of patient distress, provider stress and system strain (Wellstood et al., 2005). Registered nurses (RNs) may experience these phenomena most acutely as they take primary responsibility for managing the care of patients in the ED (Elias et al., 2013; Emergency Nurses Association, n.d.).

    • Matters of concern: A qualitative study of emergency care from the perspective of patients

      2014, Annals of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Semistructured interviews with 37 respondents yielded 23 negative experiences, 16 positive ones, and 3 neutral ones. Waiting times, perceived quality of care, and staff-patient interaction shaped patient experiences.3 In another study, 9 ED patients were interviewed to better understand their perceptions of participation in ED care.6

    • A quantitative model for patient behavioral decisions in the urgent care industry

      2013, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is estimated that there are two new UCCs opening in the U.S. each week [65]. UC is an important component of the health care system in the U.S. that has several unique characteristics [78]. First, most patients arrive in need of urgent medical treatment without a scheduled appointment, and only a few patients call in ahead of time to check the availability of urgent care.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text