We sought to evaluate the use of propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) for ED procedural sedation, particularly when administered in a routine fashion for a variety of indications.
Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted in an urban teaching ED. Propofol was administered by handheld syringe and combined with fentanyl. Measurements included propofol and fentanyl dose, serial vital signs, pulse oximetry, adverse events, and patient and physician satisfaction.
Results: One hundred thirty-six subjects (18 to 69 years) were enrolled. Procedures included 82 (60.3%) abscess incision and drainages and 47 (34.6%) orthopedic reductions. Adverse events occurred in 14 cases (10.3%; 95% confidence interval 5.2% to 15.4%), including hypotension in 5, hypoxemia in 7, and apnea in 5. One patient required intubation. Both patient and physician satisfaction were excellent.
Conclusions: ED procedural sedation with propofol was effective and well accepted by patients and physicians. However, it produced a significant incidence of hypotension, hypoxemia, and apnea.